2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10652-020-09762-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of turbulent Schmidt number on CFD simulation of $$45^\circ $$ inclined negatively buoyant jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several turbulence models have been developed to compute these two terms. The present paper employs the realizable 𝑘 − 𝜀 model of Shih et al (1995), which has been used and validated in several studies in the context of dense jets (Kheirkhah Gildeh et al 2015;Ardalan and Vafaei 2019;Tahmooresi and Ahmadyar 2021). The formulation of the realizable 𝑘 − 𝜀 turbulence model is given by:…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several turbulence models have been developed to compute these two terms. The present paper employs the realizable 𝑘 − 𝜀 model of Shih et al (1995), which has been used and validated in several studies in the context of dense jets (Kheirkhah Gildeh et al 2015;Ardalan and Vafaei 2019;Tahmooresi and Ahmadyar 2021). The formulation of the realizable 𝑘 − 𝜀 turbulence model is given by:…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several turbulence models have been developed to compute these two terms. The present paper employs the realizable − model of Shih et al (1995), which has been used and validated in several studies in the context of dense jets (Kheirkhah Gildeh et al 2015;Ardalan and Vafaei 2019;Tahmooresi and Ahmadyar 2021). The formulation of the realizable − turbulence model is given by:…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their simulations could reproduce concentration build-up at the impact point reported by Abessi and Roberts (2015); however, dilutions at the impact point and within the spreading layer were underpredicted. In a recent study, Tahmooresi and Ahmadyar (2021) examined the effects of the turbulent Schmidt number on CFD predictions of 45° inclined dense jets. They reported reducing the turbulent Schmidt number from 1.0 to 0.4 improves the dilution predictions, whereas this change adversely affects the geometrical parameters and crosssectional distribution of concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In simulating INBJs using CFD, two approaches have been used: Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations and Large-eddy simulation (LES).In RANS studies, both eddy viscosity models (EVM) and Reynolds stress models (RSM) have been employed (e.g., [22,[38][39][40][41][42][43]), with most studies focusing on Reynolds stress modeling, compared to the Reynolds flux modeling (SFM). This challenge was addressed in the study of Tahmooresi and Ahmadyar [22], where they used SFM approach to model the turbulent flux vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the range of this under prediction varies between more than 50% in some commercial codes with integral modeling approach ( [50]) and 20% in the LES modeling of 45 • inclined dens jets ( [44], [45], [47]). Employing the regional turbulent Schmidt number (RTSN) approach, [42] reduced this underestimation to ∼ 14% at the return point for 45 • inclined dens jets. Vafa et al [49] addressed the problem of underestimation of dilution in LES by changing the discretization schemes for convective terms of the filtered momentum and scalar transport equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%