2011
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2011.621800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Turbulence Models on the Numerical Simulation of Flow in Open Channel Junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard k-ε, RNG k-ε, and RSM turbulence models At the section immediately after the junction, the secondary flow predicted by the numerical models was smaller than that of the experiment (Yang et al, 2011 Asymmetrical, shaped…”
Section: Asymmetrical Shapedmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard k-ε, RNG k-ε, and RSM turbulence models At the section immediately after the junction, the secondary flow predicted by the numerical models was smaller than that of the experiment (Yang et al, 2011 Asymmetrical, shaped…”
Section: Asymmetrical Shapedmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The computational results were compared with the experimental data and showed that the new modeling approach is more accurate than the RANS approach in addition to its ability of saving computational effort comparing to the LES approach. An experiment and 3D numerical simulation were used by Yang et al (2011) [27] to examine the flow in an asymmetrical 90-degree confluent channel. They utilized the standard k-ε, RNG k-ε, and RSM turbulence models to simulate the secondary flows and separation zones, and then the results of the numerical models' predictions and the experimental data were compared and evaluated.…”
Section: Asymmetrical Shapedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] proposed a theoretical flow pattern according to the experimental observations in that study. Thereafter, the impacts of flow confluences at different channel junctions on the flow pattern and structures were widely investigated through various numerical and experimental studies in the past decades (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]). All the results of these studies have shown and evidenced that the flow junctions with different properties (e.g., size ratio, angle and water depth change due to concordant/discordant bed) could affect greatly the characteristics of the flow pattern and structures and thus the hydrodynamic responses at the confluence zone, with indicating that the effects of the flow junctions and characteristics have to be considered and included in the hydraulic modeling process so as to obtain better physical interpretations and accurate numerical predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1(b) shows the threedimensional view of the confluence flow [4]. Due to the differences of centrifugal forces along the vertical direction, a secondary circulation is generated [5][6][7]. The separation zone and secondary circulation have significant impacts on the sediment transport [2,8,9] and the pollutant dispersion [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] in confluence region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%