1998
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.1998.9516803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of turbidity on the feeding ability of the juvenile migrant stage of six New Zealand freshwater fish species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this should not be taken to mean that their abundance will be maintained in turbid rivers. Increased siltation of rivers may reduce food supplies and/or spawning sites and reduce abundance even though turbidity does not affect feeding (Rowe & Dean 1998). A high proportion (75%) of the larger (>80 mm long) smelt were not feeding and we noted that 67% of these fish contained either ripe eggs or milt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, this should not be taken to mean that their abundance will be maintained in turbid rivers. Increased siltation of rivers may reduce food supplies and/or spawning sites and reduce abundance even though turbidity does not affect feeding (Rowe & Dean 1998). A high proportion (75%) of the larger (>80 mm long) smelt were not feeding and we noted that 67% of these fish contained either ripe eggs or milt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Indeed, Rowe et al (2000) found that adult smelt and inanga were less common in turbid rivers than in clear rivers. Furthermore, correlations between turbidity level and the mean feeding rates for juvenile migratory smelt and inanga (i.e., r = -0.81 and-0.94) were both negative and higher than for other native fish species (Rowe & Dean 1998). These data suggest that smelt and inanga may be the next most sensitive native species to be affected by elevated turbidity levels in rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increased turbidity is more disruptive to animals that detect prey from a long-distance in contrast to those that detect prey at short distances (Chesney 1989;Giske et al 1994;Rowe and Dean 1998). Therefore, turbidity affects animals differently depending on their visual ecology; and those animals that are not predominantly visual may be unaffected by changing turbidity levels, including many invertebrates, which dominate animal biomass in rivers.…”
Section: Turbidity Suspended Sediment and Water Claritymentioning
confidence: 99%