2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Tubing Type, Operating Parameters, and Surfactants on Particle Formation During Peristaltic Filling Pump Processing of a mAb Formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 Although k D values were comparable to the bulk formulation, adding PS20 to the formulation completely supressed protein particle formation. This latter result is in perfect agreement with the studies from Her et al 19,20 In this study, we used k D as a simplistic approach for colloidal stability estimation. Although k D is used as a descriptor for interparticle interaction in protein solutions 43 , this parameter does not provide a full picture of colloidal stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42 Although k D values were comparable to the bulk formulation, adding PS20 to the formulation completely supressed protein particle formation. This latter result is in perfect agreement with the studies from Her et al 19,20 In this study, we used k D as a simplistic approach for colloidal stability estimation. Although k D is used as a descriptor for interparticle interaction in protein solutions 43 , this parameter does not provide a full picture of colloidal stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The particle formation propensity upon peristaltic pumping depends on formulation conditions and tubing type. 19,20 As peristaltic pumping is a complex combination of different mechanical stresses which potentially overlap with chemical stress the following factors are seen as potential drivers: temperature, exposure to interfaces, shear, and contaminants as nucleation sites. 21 Silicone tubing sheds particles into the product during pumping due to abrasion of the tubing piece in the pump head.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential drawback of this system is that the additional wear and tear of the silicone tubing has a higher potential to generate intrinsic particles from tubing materials that could enter the DP solution. 63 During peristaltic filling pump processing, unfolded protein that is adsorbed to the silicone tubing may become dislodged during pump operation and become nucleation sites for protein aggregation and particle formation. 38,63,64 The use of a longer silicone hose leads to potential increase in the amount of leachables that may compromise product quality.…”
Section: Fillingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 During peristaltic filling pump processing, unfolded protein that is adsorbed to the silicone tubing may become dislodged during pump operation and become nucleation sites for protein aggregation and particle formation. 38,63,64 The use of a longer silicone hose leads to potential increase in the amount of leachables that may compromise product quality. Additionally, for high protein concentration formulations, the suck-back (pump-reversal) on peristaltic pumps must be carefully controlled to avoid droplet formation on the end of the filling needle, which is prone to rapid drying and clogging of the filling needles during the process.…”
Section: Fillingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation