2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3,5 No randomized controlled trials were found during the literature search. Of the 22 other full-text articles included in the review, 10 studies looked at the effect of altering the current, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] 6 studies at altering kilovoltage 19,20,23,24,26,27 and 18 studies at altering exposure time factors 19,21,22,[24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] (some studies looked at more than one exposure parameter, so this total equals .20 studies). One study 40 investigated the combined effect of current and exposure times on image quality by altering mAs values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,5 No randomized controlled trials were found during the literature search. Of the 22 other full-text articles included in the review, 10 studies looked at the effect of altering the current, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] 6 studies at altering kilovoltage 19,20,23,24,26,27 and 18 studies at altering exposure time factors 19,21,22,[24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] (some studies looked at more than one exposure parameter, so this total equals .20 studies). One study 40 investigated the combined effect of current and exposure times on image quality by altering mAs values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Most of these have been aimed at the use of CBCT in implant dentistry, while others have investigated the impact on diagnosis of simulated root resorption and periapical pathosis. Only two studies have specifically looked at orthodontic-related applications of CBCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have found that there is scope for reducing exposure factors without loss of adequate image quality in various clinical contexts. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Low-dose protocols are a familiar optimization strategy for "medical" CT, 21 but there is almost no comparable literature related to dental CBCT. The impact of low-dose scanning protocols on objective measurements of image quality, available on one CBCT machine, has been assessed, 22 but this study did not include a subjective image quality assessment of clinical images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Reducing tube current causes an increase in image noise. 22,24 However, noise could be reduced by the use of a non-linear edgepreserving smoothing filter. 30 In clinical circumstances, low tube current is mostly used when a large FOV with a large resultant voxel size is needed, and high tube current is selected when a small FOV with small resultant voxel size is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Based on subjective evaluation, significant reduction in peak kilovoltage and milliampere value did not substantially affect overall image quality. 23,24 Various radiation doses from four CBCT scanners rendered different image qualities in terms of segmentation accuracy. 25 The requisites of image quality change according to the various types of examination or even various purposes within the same examinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%