2017
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.16-0328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Transendocardial Stem Cell Injection on Ventricular Proarrhythmia in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Results from the POSEIDON and TAC-HFT Trials

Abstract: Transendocardial stem cell injection in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) improves left ventricular function and structure but has ill‐defined effects on ventricular arrhythmias. We hypothesized that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) implantation is not proarrhythmic. Post hoc analyses were performed on ambulatory ECGs collected from the POSEIDON and TAC‐HFT trials. Eighty‐eight subjects (mean age 61 ± 10 years) with ICM (mean EF 32.2% ± 9.8%) received treatment with MSC (n = 48), Placebo (n = 21), or bone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Kandala et al performed a meta‐analysis of BMMNC vs control for patients with chronic ICMP and found that these cells were not associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic events. The same was true for the MSCs, which were not associated with an increase in the arrhythmic events in a short‐ or long‐term follow‐up and seemed to have a potential antiarrhythmic effect reported by Ramireddy et al…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Kandala et al performed a meta‐analysis of BMMNC vs control for patients with chronic ICMP and found that these cells were not associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic events. The same was true for the MSCs, which were not associated with an increase in the arrhythmic events in a short‐ or long‐term follow‐up and seemed to have a potential antiarrhythmic effect reported by Ramireddy et al…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…29 Safranow et al 30 patients with chronic ICMP and found that these cells were not associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic events. The same was true for the MSCs, which were not associated with an increase in the arrhythmic events in a short-or long-term follow-up 33 and seemed to have a potential antiarrhythmic effect reported by Ramireddy et al 34 Skeletal myoblast therapy has shown pro-arrhythmia responses, which was documented in clinical studies but not in controlled trials. [35][36][37][38][39] In the MAGIC trial, 7 the first double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients with ICMP undergoing CABG, no statistical significant difference in VAs was observed between the treatment group and the placebo group, although the event rate was more than two times higher in the group that received the myoblasts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…19,20,37 Furthermore, our model could not explain pre-clinical and clinical observations, where hMSC delivery to the heart had no significant effect—or even favorable protective benefits—on the arrhythmogenicity of fibrotic cardiac tissue. 13,14,21,45 These discrepancies made it clear that some other mechanism of hMSC interaction with the myocardium, neglected in our original computational model, must be responsible for the inconsistencies with experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…MSCs are multipotent cells able to differentiate into a number of different cell lines and exert immunomodulatory, anti-proliferative, and anti-inflammatory effects. Their multipotency, migratory ability, and immunoprivileged state has led to extensive research efforts for therapeutic applications in several diseases including cardiac ischemia ( 35 39 ), ischemic acute renal failure ( 37 ), sepsis ( 40 ), autoimmune disorders ( 41 ), severe graft-vs. -host disease ( 42 ), pancreatic islet and renal glomerular repair in diabetes ( 43 ), fulminant hepatic failure ( 44 ), chronic lung diseases ( 45 48 ), and acute lung injury ( 49 53 ) (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%