2008
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of trail gradient on leaf tissue transport and load size selection in leaf-cutter ants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For leafcutter ants, trail building and maintenance are a major energy cost for resource acquisition (Lugo et al 1973;Lewis et al 2008;Farji-Brener et al 2014). The energy invested into resource acquisition is generally balanced against the nutrient value of a resource (optimal diet theory; Rockwood & Hubbell 1987), and thus the trade-off between trail-building costs and resource nutritional value has been hypothesized to partially govern foraging in leafcutter ants (Shepherd 1985;Rockwood & Hubbell 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For leafcutter ants, trail building and maintenance are a major energy cost for resource acquisition (Lugo et al 1973;Lewis et al 2008;Farji-Brener et al 2014). The energy invested into resource acquisition is generally balanced against the nutrient value of a resource (optimal diet theory; Rockwood & Hubbell 1987), and thus the trade-off between trail-building costs and resource nutritional value has been hypothesized to partially govern foraging in leafcutter ants (Shepherd 1985;Rockwood & Hubbell 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Email: mewinsto@uchicago.edu Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 2015http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2015 colonies (Vasconcelos et al 2006). In light of research that has estimated trail maintenance as 75% of the total energetic costs of the colony (Lugo et al 1973), and other work that has shown leafcutters respond to specific environmental conditions to optimize performance (Lewis et al 2008;Farji-Brener et al 2014), it is possible that leafcutter foraging in disturbed habitat differs from that in undisturbed, old growth forest. Conversely, estimation of foraging costs by Howard (2001) suggests the costs of trail maintenance to be minimal relative to the number of available workers and the rates of mass harvest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Running speeds in leaf-cutting ants have been shown to depend on such environmental conditions (trail gradients [25], [26], height constraints [27]), and it is likely that these effects are based on the ants’ need to maintain stability. We previously demonstrated that grass-cutting ants can maintain stability by adjusting the fragment angle by head movements on trails with inclines (+20°) or declines (−20°), but this re-orientation did not fully compensate the predicted shift of the centre of mass [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that the selection of smaller leaf fragments was favored during evolution because of the underground processing rates of the fragments after their delivery, which are maximal for fragments of intermediate size (Burd and Howard, 2005) (but see Roces and Bollazzi, 2009). Load transport rates may also depend on environmental conditions, such as trail gradients (Lewis et al, 2008), height constraints (Dussutour et al, 2009) and fallen branches (Farji-Brener et al, 2007). The relationship between load size and transport rates is likely to be affected by these factors and hence may influence the ants' decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%