2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of tidal flooding on estuarine biogeochemistry: Quantifying flood-driven nitrogen inputs in an urban, lower Chesapeake Bay sub-tributary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ENT concentrations are comparable to the concentrations reported by Macías‐Tapia et al. (2021) in Norfolk, VA in 2017, when 95% of the ENT samples exceeded the single sample maximum threshold concentration and ENT concentrations ranged from 30 to >24,000 MPN 100 mL −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These ENT concentrations are comparable to the concentrations reported by Macías‐Tapia et al. (2021) in Norfolk, VA in 2017, when 95% of the ENT samples exceeded the single sample maximum threshold concentration and ENT concentrations ranged from 30 to >24,000 MPN 100 mL −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, the small size of the tidal floods we observed prevents us from concluding whether more extensive floods are associated with higher or lower ENT concentrations. Additionally, while our results demonstrate that tidal floods are associated with the problematic water quality impacts shown in previous studies (Hart et al, 2020;Macías-Tapia et al, 2021McKenzie et al, 2021;Price et al, 2021), similar studies as the one presented here should be conducted across more locations to better define the site-specific effects related to stormwater infrastructure GeoHealth 10.1029/2024GH001020 and land use. We suggest that future work incorporate sampling across multiple seasons, communities, and flood extents to better understand the prevalence of poor water quality from chronic stormwater network inundation and tidal flooding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This type of flood event is often known as a “sunny day flood” without any storm; in this case (November 2017) the flood occurred during the so‐called fall “King Tide” period when seasonal tides are higher than normal (Ezer, 2020a). These annual King Tide events are now used as citizen science experiments when hundreds of volunteers collect data to help map street floods, calibrate inundation models and sample floodwater for water quality analysis (Hutton & Allen, 2021; Loftis et al., 2019; Macias‐Tapia et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study area (including the Hampton Roads region surrounding Norfolk) was chosen as demonstration because the increase in flooding at this region already led to various initiatives to address public awareness and plan mitigation and adaptation strategies. These activities include for example, citizen science projects of monitoring street flooding and associated water quality issues (Hutton & Allen, 2021; Macias‐Tapia et al., 2021), engagement with local stakeholders (John & Yusuf, 2019; Yusuf et al., 2018) and development of sensor network and flood prediction systems (Loftis et al., 2019).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea level rise has increased the frequency of tidal flood events without heavy rainfall in many coastal areas worldwide [19]. The high and low tides could carry organic and inorganic materials [20]. There was water pollution in the river of Semarang [21], material from the land carried away by the tidal flood would affect the quality of water bodies.…”
Section: Physical Impacts (Environment and Infrastructure)mentioning
confidence: 99%