2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Three Months of Detraining on the Health Profile of Older Women after a Multicomponent Exercise Program

Abstract: Physical exercise results in very important benefits including preventing disease and promoting the quality of life of older individuals. Common interruptions and training cessation are associated with the loss of total health profile, and specifically cardiorespiratory fitness. Would detraining (DT) promote different effects in the cardiorespiratory and health profiles of trained and sedentary older women? Forty-seven older women were divided into an experimental group (EG) and a control group (CG) (EG: n = 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MHO panel at POST was unable to be maintained after 6 M and participants regressed to MUO (Figure 2). The decrease in the lipidic, glycaemic, and haemodynamic profiles found after 6 M of no supervision in the present study is consistent with other studies which used different populations and with alternate types of exercise, duration of intervention, and non-supervised time [36,41,42,50]. These negative effects may be secondary to detraining-induced gains in body fat, favouring a more inflammatory status, and decreased CRF, as observed in participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The MHO panel at POST was unable to be maintained after 6 M and participants regressed to MUO (Figure 2). The decrease in the lipidic, glycaemic, and haemodynamic profiles found after 6 M of no supervision in the present study is consistent with other studies which used different populations and with alternate types of exercise, duration of intervention, and non-supervised time [36,41,42,50]. These negative effects may be secondary to detraining-induced gains in body fat, favouring a more inflammatory status, and decreased CRF, as observed in participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Notwithstanding, the periodization in EFAM-UV©, and the accumulative effect of training on the long-term, still ensured a large and significant better cardiovascular capacity as compared to baseline (EV0), with a good retention even 14 weeks later. This is of paramount importance in this population, since the cardiovascular system is specially impaired with aging [ 6 , 55 , 58 ]. Blood pressure and fat mass were also improved in the long term, confirming these beneficial effects and supporting the contribution of MC cog TPs (i.e., EFAM-UV©) to neuroendocrine enhanced responses and better cardiovascular health [ 35 , 55 ], in line with aerobic interventions [ 40 , 55 ], and other EFAM-UV© studies [ 40 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partial or total interruption to habitual PA can lead to deterioration in several metabolic and functional outcomes in older adults. For example, 3 months of detraining has been shown to produce a decline in functional fitness, mental health, quality of life, cardiorespiratory fitness, and lipid, glycemic and haemodynamic profiles in physically active older adults [ 13 , 14 ]. Therefore, older adults who were regularly active before the pandemic should aim to maintain or increase their levels of PA to achieve recommended levels where possible, while complying with local and national regulations.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%