2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-009-0583-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of three Caribbean cleaner shrimps on ectoparasitic monogeneans in a semi-natural environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cleaning symbioses between obligate cleaners (shrimp, wrasse, and gobies) and client fish are classic interspecific mutualisms that provide important ecosystem services on coral reefs (Bunkley-Williams and Williams 1998;Grutter 1999a;Côté 2000;McCammon et al 2010). Although the mutualistic nature of cleaning symbioses has been questioned (see Becker and Grutter 2005;Cheney and Côté 2005), more than 130 species of fish and crustaceans have been identified as cleaners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cleaning symbioses between obligate cleaners (shrimp, wrasse, and gobies) and client fish are classic interspecific mutualisms that provide important ecosystem services on coral reefs (Bunkley-Williams and Williams 1998;Grutter 1999a;Côté 2000;McCammon et al 2010). Although the mutualistic nature of cleaning symbioses has been questioned (see Becker and Grutter 2005;Cheney and Côté 2005), more than 130 species of fish and crustaceans have been identified as cleaners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mutualistic nature of cleaning symbioses has been questioned (see Becker and Grutter 2005;Cheney and Côté 2005), more than 130 species of fish and crustaceans have been identified as cleaners. Many cleaners have been shown to effectively remove parasites (Grutter 1999a;Côté 2000;Becker and Grutter 2004;McCammon et al 2010) and may even positively impact overall fish community diversity (Bshary 2003;. The proximate causes driving client visitation to cleaning stations have also been explored, with two competing hypotheses proposed: (1) ectoparasite loading irritates fish hosts and drives compensatory cleaner-seeking behavior, and (2) tactile stimulation Abstract Dozens of marine species have been identified as "cleaners" and many of these co-occur and have considerable overlap in clientele.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least one of these species, A. pedersoni, is an experimentally verified cleaner that re moves ectoparasites from reef fishes (Bunkley-Williams & Williams 1998, McCammon et al 2010. It is yet unknown how the presence of invasive lionfish may affect crustacean behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ectoparasites vary greatly in size, studies of cleaner shrimp diets suggest that cleaners (Becker et al, 2005;Chen and Huang, 2012;Wicksten, 1995Wicksten, , 2009 feed primarily on small ectoparasites approximately 0.1-2.5 mm in length (Becker and Grutter, 2004;McCammon et al, 2010). For an ectoparasite to be one 'pixel' across to a cleaner shrimp visual system with spatial resolution of 9 deg, the shrimp would have to be 15.8 mm away from a parasite 2.5 mm in length, but 0.63 mm away from a parasite 0.1 mm in length.…”
Section: Potential Functions Of Cleaner Shrimp Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%