2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0032304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of thought suppression on provoked men’s alcohol-related physical aggression in the laboratory.

Abstract: Objective This study utilized a comprehensive theoretical approach to provide the first data on the impact of thought suppression on provoked men’s alcohol-related aggression. Method A diverse community sample (58% African-American) of males between the ages of 21 and 35 (M = 25.25) were randomly assigned to one of two beverage conditions (i.e., alcohol, no-alcohol control). Following beverage consumption, participants were provoked via reception of electric shocks and a verbal insult from a fictitious male … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(99 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Men also showed significant differences in SBP, mainly explained by higher scores on the impulse dyscontrol behavior dimension. The results are in agreement with studies that emphasize the importance of socialization in men learning maladaptive emotional control strategies, associated with an increase in behavioral disinhibition, unhealthy behaviors, or acts of aggression by men (Gallagher et al, 2014;Panno et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Men also showed significant differences in SBP, mainly explained by higher scores on the impulse dyscontrol behavior dimension. The results are in agreement with studies that emphasize the importance of socialization in men learning maladaptive emotional control strategies, associated with an increase in behavioral disinhibition, unhealthy behaviors, or acts of aggression by men (Gallagher et al, 2014;Panno et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To address this gap, pertinent theory [••14] posits that alcohol-induced attention towards provocation produces (1) general negative affect that may subsequently generate a refined affective state of anger, (2) excessive hostile rumination about the provocation, the transgressor, and/or the behavioral responses required to resolve the provocative situation, and (3) reductions in self-awareness. Studies indicate that aggression is more likely when these more proximal processes are induced [28, 29, 30], which is further supported by studies that directly examine alcohol effects (anger: [31, 32, 33]; hostile rumination: [34, 35]; self-awareness: [••25, 36]). Collectively, these findings suggest that alcohol-induced attentional biases may increase aggression risk by (1) concentrating attentional processes on angry affect and the hostile transgression, and (2) compromising attentional processing of internal standards and situational norms, which will increase the likelihood that intoxicated behavior does not appropriately match situational, non-aggressive norms.…”
Section: Proposed Mechanisms Of Alcohol-facilitated Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Students can use the Internet anytime and anywhere due to the wide adoption of campus-wide Internet access, smartphones, and data coverage [ 4 ]. This may limit the visible manifestation of symptoms such as tolerance in that there is a “ceiling effect” [ 41 ]—it is impossible for students to spend more than 24 hours in one day on the Internet. In addition, students in the focus groups appeared to be able to access the Internet whenever they have a desire to engage in Internet-related activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%