2017
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Thinning Intensity on Carbon Stocks and Changes in Larch Forests in China Northeast Forest Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al . 37 also discovered that the total carbon stock declined with thinning for larch forests; and Ruiz-Peinado et al . 38 showed that non-thinned stands had the highest carbon stocks for Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Li et al . 37 also discovered that the total carbon stock declined with thinning for larch forests; and Ruiz-Peinado et al . 38 showed that non-thinned stands had the highest carbon stocks for Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Only in the MT plot, the annual carbon stock rate of Manchurian ash transferred from decreasing to increasing (Figure 5). The differential response of Korean pine and Manchurian ash to thinning offers some explanation to previous P r e p r i n t inconsistent results about thinning's impacts on forest carbon stocks (del Río et al, 2017;Lin et al, 2018;Schaedel et al, 2017;Shuyong et al, 2017).…”
Section: P R E P R I N Tmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Through intentionally removing trees to regulate competition, thinning reallocates the growing space, improve growing conditions (ex: light, temperature, water, nutrients) for residual trees, support vigorous tree growth, minimize tree mortality and thus increase forest growth, timber productivity and economic value (Eriksson, 2006;Geng et al, 2021;Saarinen et al, 2020). Many studies have examined the effects of thinning on carbon stocks (del Río et al, 2017;Lin et al, 2018;Schaedel et al, 2017;Shuyong et al, 2017), but previous results remain inconsistent. The rapid regeneration of understory vegetation and the fast growth of post-thinning survivors could lead to greater carbon sequestration rates (Briceño et al, 2006;Hoover and Stout, 2007;López et al, 2003;Schilling et al, 1999;Zheng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%