1968
DOI: 10.1080/00221589.1968.11514264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Thinning Blossom and Fruitlets on Growth and Cropping of Sunset Apple

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The view that the number of cells created in the early post-pollination period determines apple size is widely held (Smith, 1950 ;Bain and Robertson, 1951 ;Westwood et al, 1967 ;Quinlan and Preston, 1968 ;Pratt, 1988 ;Marguery and Sangwan, 1993 ;Goffinet et al, 1995). Early-season fruit thinning increases fruit size and cell number, rather than cell size (Quinlan and Preston, 1968 ;Goffinet et al, 1995), and year-to-year variation in apple fruit size is linked most strongly to variation in cell number . The correlation between cell number and fruit size also holds for other fruit types (Roth, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The view that the number of cells created in the early post-pollination period determines apple size is widely held (Smith, 1950 ;Bain and Robertson, 1951 ;Westwood et al, 1967 ;Quinlan and Preston, 1968 ;Pratt, 1988 ;Marguery and Sangwan, 1993 ;Goffinet et al, 1995). Early-season fruit thinning increases fruit size and cell number, rather than cell size (Quinlan and Preston, 1968 ;Goffinet et al, 1995), and year-to-year variation in apple fruit size is linked most strongly to variation in cell number . The correlation between cell number and fruit size also holds for other fruit types (Roth, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was suggested (Bertin, 1981;Stephenson, 1981) that there is a threshold seed number below which it is advantageous to abort fruits. However, this threshold may vary according to the plant's resources and the numher of developing fruits (Quinlan & Preston, 1968). The function of fruit abortion in wind pollinated dioecious perennials that have small green pericarps, such as aspen, is not clear unless there is a disadvantage in wind seed dispersal associated with fruits with low numbers of seeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, non-viable pollen grains may contribute cell exudates to tbe stigmatic surface which could affect the viable ones. Variation in pollen loading has been reported to lead to variation in seed number among fruits, wbich in turn leads to the higher probability of abortion of fruits with low seed number (Murneek, 1954;Quinlan & Preston, 1968;Sweet, 1973;Lee, 1980;Bertin, 1981;Gross & Werner, 1983;Cole & Frimage, 1984;McCall & Primack, 1985). Furthermore, it was suggested (Bertin, 1981;Stephenson, 1981) that there is a threshold seed number below which it is advantageous to abort fruits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the final fruit count is a decreasing function of the initial bud count. We note in this context that, in agricultural circles, it has long been known that artificial thinning of inflorescences results in substantial decreases in fruit abortion (Quinlan & Preston 1968). If our hypothesis is correct then, in legumes at any rate, high seeds/pod represents one of the most widespread adaptations to the rigours of drier environments.…”
Section: Reproductive Behaviour In Arid Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%