1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0488(19960915)34:12<1997::aid-polb5>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the type of crosslink on viscoelastic properties of natural rubber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
1
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it decreased F solpol and, hence, increased the quantity of elastically effective chains. Both effects led to an increase in the storage modulus, as observed in other elastomers and elastomer composites …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…On the other hand, it decreased F solpol and, hence, increased the quantity of elastically effective chains. Both effects led to an increase in the storage modulus, as observed in other elastomers and elastomer composites …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The volume fraction (V r ) and cross-link density of the rubber composites are estimated from swelling measurements. 25,26 Surface morphology Studies on the morphology of tensile fractured surfaces of the composite are carried out using variable pressure field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM; model SU 6000, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The fractured end of the specimen is sputter coated with a thin layer of gold to avoid electrostatic charging during the SEM analysis.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pure blends were mixed with 95% sulfur, 5% cyclohexyl benzothiazole sulfenamide, 5% zinc oxide, and 5% stearic acid. 28 The samples were then heated at 120°C for 8 h. They were then heated at 120°C for 8 h. The NR is ebonized by this method, so it appeared as a black stained portion. The lighter shaded portion was the SBR part.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem) Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%