2004
DOI: 10.1021/la036364x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the SO4 Groups on the Textural Properties and Local Order Deformation of SnO2 Rutile Structure

Abstract: Sulfated tin oxide was synthesized from a hydroxylated tin oxide obtained by the precipitation method, followed by ion exchange of OH groups by SO4 species with a sulfuric acid solution. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, thermoanalysis, and nitrogen physisorption by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method. The rutile crystalline structure was refined by the Rietveld method. Thermal analysis suggests the following stoichiometric formulas: SnO2-x(OH)2x and SnO2-x(OH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as SnO 2 ·nH 2 O is concerned, the main weight loss (about 12 % of the total loss), observed in the 50-150 °C range, can be attributed to the loss of physisorbed water, while the loss of structural and bound water occurred gradually between 250 and 450 °C [43][44][45]. The TG profile of S-SnO 2 shows two different weight losses; the first one, occurring in the 50-150 °C range, corresponds to water desorption, whereas the weight loss occurring in the 600-760 °C range (about 4% of the total loss) can be attributed to the splitting off of sulfate groups bound to the surface of SnO 2 crystallites [46]. TG analysis thus revealed that the acidic surface functionalities are thermally stable in the temperature range of interest for DMFC applications.…”
Section: Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As far as SnO 2 ·nH 2 O is concerned, the main weight loss (about 12 % of the total loss), observed in the 50-150 °C range, can be attributed to the loss of physisorbed water, while the loss of structural and bound water occurred gradually between 250 and 450 °C [43][44][45]. The TG profile of S-SnO 2 shows two different weight losses; the first one, occurring in the 50-150 °C range, corresponds to water desorption, whereas the weight loss occurring in the 600-760 °C range (about 4% of the total loss) can be attributed to the splitting off of sulfate groups bound to the surface of SnO 2 crystallites [46]. TG analysis thus revealed that the acidic surface functionalities are thermally stable in the temperature range of interest for DMFC applications.…”
Section: Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the high-angle XRD, both samples show obvious peaks at $27, 34, 38, 52, 65°( figure 1c and d), which are assigned to tetragonal phase of crystalline SnO 2 [22]. These results suggest that MST-X is composed of crystalline SnO 2 tetragonal phase, which is very important for the formation of strong acidic sites in sulfated tin oxide [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows the TG curves of MST-500 and MST-550 samples. Notably, there are two weight-loss steps: the first step below 200°C is due to desorption of water; the second step between 500 and 900°C is attributed to decomposition of sulfate species on the sample [22]. Based on the amount of weight loss, the amount of sulfate species is estimated on the surface of MST-500 (4.78 wt%) and MST-550 (3.48 wt%), which is higher than that of CST-500 (3.31 wt%) and CST-550 (2.96 wt%) (table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows the TG curves of various samples. All samples give two weight-loss steps: the first step below 200°C is due to the desorption of water; the second step between 500 and 900°C is attributed to the decomposition of sulfate species on the sample [35]. Based on the curves, the amount of sulfate species on the surface of sul-SnO 2 (x) (x = 0-0.33) are estimated between 4.93 and 5.25 wt%, which is much higher than that on the surface of ST (3.44%) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Rusults and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%