2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the sludge reduction system in MBR on the membrane permeability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 revealed that, higher MLSS concentration could cause faster decrease of permeate flux. Similar results have been reported in previous [6], and the reason may be attributed to: 1) more particles accumulate on the membrane [9], 2) sludge accumulation and thickening occurs in the spaces among the fibres [10], 3) high filtration resistance results from high viscosity [20]. The duration of decreasing of permeate flux from the initial 15 to 10 dm 3 ·m -2 ·h -1 under MLSS of 8 g·dm -3 was nearly twofold higher than that under MLSS of 11.7 g·dm -3 .…”
Section: Effect Of Mlss Concentration On Membrane Permeate Fluxsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 revealed that, higher MLSS concentration could cause faster decrease of permeate flux. Similar results have been reported in previous [6], and the reason may be attributed to: 1) more particles accumulate on the membrane [9], 2) sludge accumulation and thickening occurs in the spaces among the fibres [10], 3) high filtration resistance results from high viscosity [20]. The duration of decreasing of permeate flux from the initial 15 to 10 dm 3 ·m -2 ·h -1 under MLSS of 8 g·dm -3 was nearly twofold higher than that under MLSS of 11.7 g·dm -3 .…”
Section: Effect Of Mlss Concentration On Membrane Permeate Fluxsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Due to the retention of suspended solids (SS) by membrane, MBR has the advantage of a higher biomass concentration than most CAS processes. Nevertheless, the concentration of biomass could also influence membrane permeability [5,6]. The examination of membrane permeate flux under two different MLSS concentration, i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Mlss Concentration On Membrane Permeate Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, sludge dewatering is obligatory for such treatment plants and accounts for approximately 50%-60% of the total operating cost of the entire wastewater treatment plant (Appels et al, 2008;Rai et al, 2004). Although conventional sludge dewatering techniques such as clarification, gravity thickening are simple, the clarification is difficult to meet stringent regulations for effluent water quality and the sludge retention time is long and an unpleasant odor is emitted in gravity thickening process (Kim et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2008). Furthermore, the high-nutrient-rich centrate obtained from the stabilization of digested sludge increases the influent nitrogen loading by 15%-20% and phosphorus loading by 8% after combining with raw wastewater (Fux et al, 2002;Wild et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been generally accepted that the membrane fouling is due to particle deposition on membrane surface and/or colloidal particle deposition inside membrane pores . These processes are mainly affected by membrane materials, feedwater characteristics, sludge characteristics, and operating conditions (Judd, 2004;Meng et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010;Cosenza et al, 2013;Mannina and Cosenza, 2013;Estrada-Arriaga, et al, 2015). Among them, sludge characteristics are considered to be directly affected by the feedwater characteristics and operating conditions (i.e., aeration, hydraulic conditions, sludge retention time (SRT), hydraulic retention time (HRT), organic loading rate, and food microorganism ratio (F/M)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%