1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1910(86)90040-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the gregarious parasitoids, Apanteles ruficrus and A. Kariyai, on host growth and development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the growth rate of parasitized larvae was less than that of non-parasitized larvae, the body mass of parasitized larvae continued to increase after oviposition by M. similis. This phenomenon was observed previously (Sato et al 1986). It has been shown that protein synthesis continued during the growth of immature stages of parasitoids in the host body.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Although the growth rate of parasitized larvae was less than that of non-parasitized larvae, the body mass of parasitized larvae continued to increase after oviposition by M. similis. This phenomenon was observed previously (Sato et al 1986). It has been shown that protein synthesis continued during the growth of immature stages of parasitoids in the host body.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…nov near sinope showed preference for third-instar immature and pre-reproductive female P. madeirensis. et al, 2003) but was reported in a few studies (Sato et al, 1986;Schopf & Steinberger, 1996). Coccidoxenoides perminutus Girault [= C. peregrinus (Timberlake)] parasitized all developmental stages of the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) but showed preference for second-and third-instar nymphs (Ceballo & Walter, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is because most solitary species reduce host food consumption greatly, and many arrest host growth prior to the ®nal instar, whereas gregarious koinobionts frequently stimulate host feeding behaviour and thus increase host-induced damage (Tanaka et al, 1984;Sato et al, 1986). This is because most solitary species reduce host food consumption greatly, and many arrest host growth prior to the ®nal instar, whereas gregarious koinobionts frequently stimulate host feeding behaviour and thus increase host-induced damage (Tanaka et al, 1984;Sato et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have revealed that the effects of parasitism on host growth and development often vary between solitary and gregarious koinobiont endoparasitoids. By contrast, the growth of hosts parasitised by gregarious endoparasitoids is frequently increased after parasitism, compared with healthy hosts (Parker & Pinnell, 1973;Sato et al, 1986;Dushay & Beckage, 1993;Alleyne & Beckage, 1997;Schopf & Steinberger, 1997). By contrast, the growth of hosts parasitised by gregarious endoparasitoids is frequently increased after parasitism, compared with healthy hosts (Parker & Pinnell, 1973;Sato et al, 1986;Dushay & Beckage, 1993;Alleyne & Beckage, 1997;Schopf & Steinberger, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%