2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the Femoral Offset and the Head Size on the Safe Range of Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
71
1
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
71
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Femoral offset is an important design feature that should be optimized since it profoundly affects mechanical function of the replaced hip 19) . Reduced femoral offset reduces the range of motion and detrimentally affect polyethylene wear and acetabular loosening rates 20) . Third, to improve range of motion and minimize prosthetic impingement, the headto-neck ratio was increased by using a 36 mm femoral head and a decreased neck diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral offset is an important design feature that should be optimized since it profoundly affects mechanical function of the replaced hip 19) . Reduced femoral offset reduces the range of motion and detrimentally affect polyethylene wear and acetabular loosening rates 20) . Third, to improve range of motion and minimize prosthetic impingement, the headto-neck ratio was increased by using a 36 mm femoral head and a decreased neck diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the increased risk of postoperative implant dislocation in patients who were overweight and obese may also reflect only a more difficult surgical procedure (as a result of excessive mass of adipose and muscle tissues) resulting in suboptimal orientation of the prosthetic components, the abduction angle and anteversion of the cup [38], the femoral anteversion of the stem [23], and the restoration of offset [26] were measured for each patient ( Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time the offset recovery has been neglected in comparison to the restoration of leg length. However, studies have indicated that a reduced offset can have severe consequences [4], like instability of the hip joint. By causing low soft tissue tension it leads to a restricted range of motion and an increased risk of dislocation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%