Effects of the display angle in museums on user's cognition, behavior, and subjective responses

Ichino, Junko; Isoda, Kazuo; Hanai, Ayako; Ueda, Tetsuya

doi:10.1145/2470654.2481413

Cited by 12 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Users were more likely to perform two-handed, multi-touch gestures on the touch wall than on the touch table. Our study expands prior work observing gesture interactions of museum visitors [8,[24][25][26][27]29,32] to compare two touch platforms and to use unobtrusive methods to collect gesture interaction data. Based on our analysis, we present design implications for gestural interaction on large touchscreen displays, especially in public settings.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…Previous work on general touchscreen interactions with single users and users in groups has provided many design considerations to improve usability. Ichino et al [29] performed a controlled laboratory exhibit to compare user responses to different display angles in museums; users rated tilted displays as superior in attracting attention and ease of use and interaction. Rogers et al [43] reported from a user study that a horizontal display resulted in members switching roles more often and having a greater awareness of the other group members, while the vertical display hindered collaboration.…”

Section: Interactive Tabletops and Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Little work has explicitly compared interaction on different platforms, however (e.g., [29,43]). For example, large touchscreen displays can be deployed flat, as in a table, or vertically, as on a wall.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Gestures by Children and Adults on Touch Tables and Touch Walls in a Public Science Center

Anthony

Stofer

Luc

et al. 2016

Proceedings of the the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on children's interactions with touchscreen devices has examined small and large screens and compared interaction to adults or among children of different ages. Little work has explicitly compared interaction on different platforms, however. Large touchscreen displays can be deployed flat, as in a table, or vertically, as on a wall. While these two form factors have been studied, it is not known what differences may exist between them. We present a study of visitors to a science museum, including children and their parents, who interacted with Google Earth on either a touch table or a touch wall. We compare the types of gestures and interactions attempted on each device and find several interesting results, including: users of all ages tend to make standard touchscreen gestures on both platforms, but children were more likely than adults to try new gestures. Users were more likely to perform two-handed, multi-touch gestures on the touch wall than on the touch table. Our findings will inform the design of future interactive applications for each platform. CCS Concepts • Human-centered computing~Gestural input • Human-centered computing~Empirical studies in HCI • Human-centered computing~Touch screens • Human-centered computing~Field studies • Human-centered computing~Collaborative interaction

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 78%

Section: Interactive Tabletops and Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Gestures by Children and Adults on Touch Tables and Touch Walls in a Public Science Center

Anthony

Stofer

Luc

et al. 2016

Proceedings of the the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They report on a variety of factors influenced by the configuration, e. g. participants noted different ergonomic issues between vertical and horizontal displays. Ichino et al [72] investigated the influence of display configuration in a museum context and found that tilted displays increased user experience (e. g. attracted attention and increased understanding of content). Forlines et al [46] showed that both display configuration and group size influence the performance for visual search tasks.…”

Section: Display Configurationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optically Dynamic Interfaces

Lindlbauer

2017

Adjunct Publication of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the virtual world, changing properties of objects such as their color, size or shape is one of the main means of communication. Objects are hidden or revealed when needed, or undergo changes in color or size to communicate importance. Users are in full control over how the virtual world looks and behaves. With augmented reality, virtual content is overlaid over the physical world to display information. Virtual reality enables users to completely dive into artificial environments. In the physical world, however, these features are not readily available. In this dissertation, we investigate how the dynamics of the virtual world can be brought into the real world. We are interested in modifying the optical properties of physical objects and devices to foster interaction and make the physical world more dynamic. To achieve this, we propose the concept of optically dynamic interfaces. Those interfaces change their appearance dynamically either through embedded capabilities or external augmentation. We describe the model of optically dynamic interfaces with three interconnected levels: dynamic objects, augmented objects and augmented surroundings. Dynamic objects are devices that integrate the capabilities to undergo visual changes. Augmented objects exhibit optically dynamic behavior through external augmentation. With augmented surroundings, objects that are unsuited for external augmentation due to their surface properties gain the ability the change their appearance. We present implementations of each of the levels and characterize their design spaces to gain insights into capabilities and limitations. Finally, we connect optically dynamic interfaces back to the virtual world with a new type of mixed reality, termed Remixed Reality. v I am in the lucky-and maybe unique-position of being able to thank not one but three advisors who guided my way throughout the process of this dissertation. Prof. Marc Alexa as my advisor at the Computer Graphics lab at TU Berlin. He helped me to foster the technical side of my research and kept me grounded when my ideas got a bit too crazy. Prof. Jörg Müller as my advisor during my time at the QU Lab at TU Berlin. He helped me shape the big picture of my research and continued to share his insights and feedback even after I left the lab. Prof. Michael Haller was my advisor during my studies in Hagenberg and during the first year of my doctoral studies. He introduced me to the field of HCI, and opened the gate to the world I am now part of. I would like to thank all of you for your continuing support and the way you shaped me as a researcher and as a person. Over the years I had the pleasure of working with many great people. Everything started at the Media Interaction Lab in Hagenberg. I would like to thank my colleagues and friends Kathrin Probst, Christian Rendl, Florian Perteneder, Jakob Leitner and Thomas Seifried for many interesting discussions and fruitful collaboration. I am grateful to Prof. Mark Hancock and Prof. Stacey Scott for their help during my time at the Univers...

show abstract

“…Past research has also explored how display angle affects a range of different aspects of usersÕ interaction with large interactive displays (e.g. [8,9]). However, relatively little attention has been paid to the impact that display angle has on usersÕ physiology over time and consequential musculoskeletal damage.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Fatigue When Using Large Horizontal and Vertical Multi-touch Interaction Displays

Al-Megren

Kharrufa

Hook

et al. 2015

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effects of the display angle in museums on user's cognition, behavior, and subjective responses

Cited by 12 publications

References 16 publications

Gestures by Children and Adults on Touch Tables and Touch Walls in a Public Science Center

Gestures by Children and Adults on Touch Tables and Touch Walls in a Public Science Center

Optically Dynamic Interfaces

Comparing Fatigue When Using Large Horizontal and Vertical Multi-touch Interaction Displays

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About