2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the degree of processing of insect ingredients in snacks on expected emotional experiences and willingness to eat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
119
1
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
17
119
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the results of this study indicated that cricket powder inclusion level of 30% is acceptable in protein powders, and it did not detract from the participants’ liking of the mouthfeel, indicating that it was able to solubilize in water. Furthermore, the results agree with other studies that have found that if the insects are processed (ground into a powder) and mixed into a familiar context, they are more acceptable to consumers (Gmuer et al., ; Menozzi et al., ; Pascucci & de Magistris, ; Sogari et al., ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, the results of this study indicated that cricket powder inclusion level of 30% is acceptable in protein powders, and it did not detract from the participants’ liking of the mouthfeel, indicating that it was able to solubilize in water. Furthermore, the results agree with other studies that have found that if the insects are processed (ground into a powder) and mixed into a familiar context, they are more acceptable to consumers (Gmuer et al., ; Menozzi et al., ; Pascucci & de Magistris, ; Sogari et al., ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Insects are historically consumed in Africa, South America, Asia, and Central America (van Huis et al, 2013). The types of insects being consumed range from ants, beetles, and bees to grasshoppers and crickets (Gmuer, Nuessli Guth, Hartmann, & Siegrist, 2016;Tan et al, 2015). Due to future challenges in food sustainability, insects as feed and food have been discussed JFDS-2019-1613Submitted 10/2/2019, Accepted 12/20/2019 and promoted for decades (Gmuer et al, 2016;van Huis, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research also found a link between physical state and perceived healthiness. In contrast to Szocs and Lefebvre (30), who argue that the blender effect is “linear” when they investigated the effect of physical state on perceived healthiness and calorie content (more processed means less healthy and higher calories), we concur with Gmuer et al (29) in arguing that the relationship between physical state and acceptance is much more complex. We found a few examples of where higher levels of processing did not necessarily result in higher greater levels of acceptance, e.g., concentrated extracts would be accepted if they offered a benefit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Using mechanical processing, Szocs and Lefebvre (30) find that perceived healthiness is influenced not only by the physical state but also by the degree of processing suggested by the physical state. Gmuer et al (29) who explore consumer responses to crickets presented as (1) flour, (2) deep-fried bits, (3) a snack mix comprising bits mixed with tortilla chips, and (4) deep-fried whole crickets, found that the degree of processing influenced willingness to eat insects. However, they also indicate that the relationship is more complex than suggested from previous research; whereas previous research suggested that a higher level of processing, with the insect ingredient being less visible, is associated higher levels of acceptance (32, 33), these researchers found a less “linear” relationship.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance/rejection Of Foodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly instructive, it is argued, is the ability of such investigation to go beyond abstract ideas of 'willingness to eat' novel foods such as insects (e.g. Gmuer, Guth, Hartmann, & Siegrist, 2016). Instead, such analysis engages with the social and geographic context of food consumption in determining the 'acceptance' of novel foods: the how, what, when, where and why that afect food consumption outside of the psychology lab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%