1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00007235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the burrowing mayfly, Hexagenia, on nitrogen and sulfur fractions in lake sediment microcosms

Abstract: Effects of the burrowing mayfly, Hexagenia, on nitrogen and sulfur fractions of sediment, and overlying water were determined.Laboratory microcosms were used to reproduce the benthic environment. The activities of Hexagenia increased sediment Eh (1.98 ± 0.486 (22) mV day-l), and decreased pH in sediment (-0.007 ± 0.001 (22) day-1 ) and overlying water (-0.024 ± 0.004(10) day-'). In the control, Eh decreased and pH did not change. The presence of Hexagenia also markedly increased ammonia in sediment (5.46 ± 0.1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organisms may accelerate this process and affect S transformation by altering these parameters via burrowing and active pumping (Lawrence et al, 1982;Lawrence & Mitchell, 1985). Moderate numbers of small benthic organisms (e.g., chironomids, tubificids) were observed in all cores at all sampling times and no attempt was made to remove them except that large bivalves, only present in Oneida Lake, were excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms may accelerate this process and affect S transformation by altering these parameters via burrowing and active pumping (Lawrence et al, 1982;Lawrence & Mitchell, 1985). Moderate numbers of small benthic organisms (e.g., chironomids, tubificids) were observed in all cores at all sampling times and no attempt was made to remove them except that large bivalves, only present in Oneida Lake, were excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, concentrations of AVS in surficial sediments have been shown to vary seasonally [16,17], presumably due to changes in rates of formation versus oxidation of AVS. Significant oxidation of surficial sediments can also occur as a result of the activity of benthic organisms [18][19][20][21]. No work has been done, however, to investigate the potential changes in bioavailability of metals in surficial sediments under the oxic conditions potentially associated with bioturbation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Redox changes can alter metal binding affinities between the solid and dissolved phases, significantly modifying the speciation and bioavailability of most metals in sediments (De Jonge et al, 2012;Doyle and Otte, 1997;Granberg et al, 2008). The concentration of AVS has a major influence on metal bioavailability, and for sediments containing a molar excess of acid volatile sulfide (AVS) over simultaneously extractable metals (SEM, ΣCd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn), it is predicted that the porewater concentrations of these metals will be negligible and should not cause direct toxicity to benthic organisms Hansen et al, 2005;Lawrence et al, 1982). In addition, the activity of microbes such as Desulfuromonadales and Geobacter sulfurreducens in abandoned burrows also contributes to the release of metals from anoxic sediments to the pore waters and overlying water column (Kristensen, 2008;Meysman et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%