1994
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90654-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the 5-HT1a receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT and other non-photic stimuli on the circadian rhythm of wheel-running activity in hamsters under different constant conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, bottom panel), and even though cage cleaning actually appeared more arousing in DD-housed than in RR-housed animals. This result is consistent with our recent finding that saline injections induced significant phase advances during late subjective day in RR-housed but not in DD-housed animals (Rosenwasser et al, in press), and with other studies showing that a variety of non-photic phase shifting stimuli -including saline injections -may be effective only when animals are housed in constant light (Coleman and Francis, 1991;Cutrera et al, 1994). Two possible explanations for such results are: (1) incidental photic stimulation occurring during the delivery of the non-photic stimulus may antagonize non-photic phase shifting; or (2) Downloaded by [Simon Fraser University] at 07:14 20 November 2014 animals housed in constant light may show increased sensitivity to otherwise ineffective phase shifting stimuli, perhaps due to a reduced circadian amplitude.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1, bottom panel), and even though cage cleaning actually appeared more arousing in DD-housed than in RR-housed animals. This result is consistent with our recent finding that saline injections induced significant phase advances during late subjective day in RR-housed but not in DD-housed animals (Rosenwasser et al, in press), and with other studies showing that a variety of non-photic phase shifting stimuli -including saline injections -may be effective only when animals are housed in constant light (Coleman and Francis, 1991;Cutrera et al, 1994). Two possible explanations for such results are: (1) incidental photic stimulation occurring during the delivery of the non-photic stimulus may antagonize non-photic phase shifting; or (2) Downloaded by [Simon Fraser University] at 07:14 20 November 2014 animals housed in constant light may show increased sensitivity to otherwise ineffective phase shifting stimuli, perhaps due to a reduced circadian amplitude.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This phenomenon is similar to that reported previously, where hamsters kept under LL for a longer duration (10 days) and then released to DD exhibited phase advances of similar magnitude (1). Also, hamsters housed under LL for periods long enough to promote free-running activity exhibited ϳ2-to 3-h phase-advance shifts in response to a variety of nonphotic stimuli, including control injections (8). We have reported that the large potentiating effects of brief LL exposure on 8-OH-DPAT phase-advance shifts at ZT 6 is lost after 3 days of LL exposure, owing largely to the increased shifting responses of controls masking the drug effect (24).…”
Section: Brief Constant Light Exposure Hypersensitizes Serotonergic Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have also reported saline-induced phase advances during the late subjective day Meyer et al, 1993), and this effect has been attributed to handling and arousal since similar shifts were not seen when saline was delivered by a remote infusion system . Furthermore, a recent study showed that several nonphotic stimuli, including saline injections, produced daytime phase advances in constant light but not in constant darkness (Cutrera et al, 1994), as seen in the Downloaded by [North Carolina State University] at 06:22 10 April 2015 present study. The basis for this apparent interaction between non-photic phase shifting and background lighting has not yet been elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Thus the dark-pulse type PRC is commonly referred to as the "non-photic" PRC. A number of pharmacological agents, including serotonergic agonists (Medanic and Gillette, 1992;Tominaga et al, 1992;Edgar et al, 1993;Prosser et al, 1993;Cutrera et al, 1994), benzodiazepines (Turek and Losee-Olson, 1986;Wee and Turek, 1989a;Biello et al, 1991;Morin, 1991;Meyer et al, 1993), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) (Albers et al, 1991) can also induce phase shifts mimicking the non-photic PRC, either in behaving animals or in vitro preparations, or both. For some of these agents, phase shifts seen in behaving animals may be mediated by drug-induced behavioral activation (Van Reeth and Turek, 1989), but this does not appear true of all such agents .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%