1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02765184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of text illustrations: A review of research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
17

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 591 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
83
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Visually attractive pictures that are only loosely related to the text content can actually distract students from processing the main information from the text and can even have detrimental effects on student performance (seductive details effect; Harp & Mayer, 1998;Rey, 2012). The evidence-based recommendation is therefore not to present pictures that just look "motivational" but, rather, to use pictures that illustrate main ideas from the text (Carney & Levin, 2002;Levie & Lentz, 1982). Representational pictures that illustrate relevant text content and therefore help students to do better in tests (Lindner et al, 2017) were shown to be more motivating than pictures that instructors consider visually appealing.…”
Section: Dekker Et Al (2012)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visually attractive pictures that are only loosely related to the text content can actually distract students from processing the main information from the text and can even have detrimental effects on student performance (seductive details effect; Harp & Mayer, 1998;Rey, 2012). The evidence-based recommendation is therefore not to present pictures that just look "motivational" but, rather, to use pictures that illustrate main ideas from the text (Carney & Levin, 2002;Levie & Lentz, 1982). Representational pictures that illustrate relevant text content and therefore help students to do better in tests (Lindner et al, 2017) were shown to be more motivating than pictures that instructors consider visually appealing.…”
Section: Dekker Et Al (2012)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomarker reference values available from the literature and cited in the Supplemental Table S1, were based on data available for non-Hispanic white children, not other racial/ethnic groups. Although the external validity of these findings to other Spanish-speaking immigrant audiences is unknown, the methods applied to the development of the tool are consistent with theories of visual information processing [83] and cross-cultural adaptation principles [84], with efforts to reduce client cognitive load for those federal program participants with a broad range of literacy skills [85]. As parents volunteered to participate and were not randomly drawn from the larger low-income Spanish-speaking WIC and Head Start populations, the variability of their responses may be smaller compared to that of the general limited-resource target population.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Furthermore, consumers are required to take pictures or videos and edit texts, such cumbersome steps will cost more time and execution cost that the image-based reviews or video-based reviews are more valuable, greatly improving the trusts of consumers. American scholars once made a comparative study about the reading effects of the illustrated and no illustrated textbook, which showed that the reading effects of the illustrated textbook were more prominent and the subjects obtained 25% more information from illustrated textbook than no illustrated (Levie & Lentz, 1982). The images or videos in image-based online reviews or video-based online reviews reinforce text content in the reviews, and present products to consumers in multisensory respects.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Dual Coding Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%