2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of temporally shifted irradiation of blue and red LED light on cos lettuce growth and morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because there is great potential to reduce costs by designing more efficient lighting systems, many studies have investigated the effects of light intensity and wavelength on plant growth (Hogewoning et al, 2010;Joshi et al, 2017;Li et al, 2013;Li and Kubota, 2009;Lin et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2015). There has been controversy in the recent literature regarding the effect of alternating red and blue lighting on the growth of lettuce: Kuno et al (2017) showed that alternating irradiation promoted growth compared with simultaneous irradiation of red and blue light at the same DLI and day length at 30 DAS, whereas Jishi et al (2016) showed no significant difference between the two conditions at 21 DAS. It is highly possible that differences in cultivation stage could explain this difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because there is great potential to reduce costs by designing more efficient lighting systems, many studies have investigated the effects of light intensity and wavelength on plant growth (Hogewoning et al, 2010;Joshi et al, 2017;Li et al, 2013;Li and Kubota, 2009;Lin et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2015). There has been controversy in the recent literature regarding the effect of alternating red and blue lighting on the growth of lettuce: Kuno et al (2017) showed that alternating irradiation promoted growth compared with simultaneous irradiation of red and blue light at the same DLI and day length at 30 DAS, whereas Jishi et al (2016) showed no significant difference between the two conditions at 21 DAS. It is highly possible that differences in cultivation stage could explain this difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Shimokawa et al (2014) and Chen et al (2017) reported that alternating red and blue light could affect growth of lettuce, but the authors could not conclude whether it had benefit for plant growth compared with simultaneous red and blue light because the growth period was short or the daily light integral (DLI) and day length were not comparable among treatments. Recently, Kuno et al (2017) showed that alternating red and blue light could enhance growth in leafy lettuce compared with simultaneous red and blue light under equal DLI and day length, but Jishi et al (2016) showed the opposite result in cos lettuce. Thus, the effect of alternating red and blue light on plant growth and the underlying mechanisms remain to be clarified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, it is expected that a higher light intensity would result in a higher biomass accumulation [35]. An increment in the dry leaves' biomass has been observed in lettuce grown under 220 µmol m −2 s −1 PPFD [33].…”
Section: Effect Of Different Growing Conditions On Biomass Accumulatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the level of the PPFD has to be controlled in order to match with the plants' needs in each growth stage. For example, in the seeding stage, many type of plants require low PPFD such as 50-100 μmol m -2 s -1 (Johkan et al, 2010;Godo et al, 2011;Rabara et al, 2017), and for the vegetative growth stage, the plants require higher PPFD of about 200-400 μmol m -2 s -1 (Jishi et al, 2016;Bantis et al, 2016;Amoozgar et al, 2017;Yao et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2017). The level of PPFD could be controlled by adjusting the intensity of the light sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%