Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundOver fifty percent of stroke patients experience chronic arm hand performance problems, compromising independence in daily life activities and quality of life. Task-oriented training may improve arm hand performance after stroke, whereby augmented therapy may lead to a better treatment outcome. Technology-supported training holds opportunities for increasing training intensity. However, the effects of robot-supported task-oriented training with real life objects in stroke patients are not known to date. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness and added value of the Haptic Master robot combined with task-oriented arm hand training in chronic stroke patients.MethodsIn a single-blind randomized controlled trial, 22 chronic stroke patients were randomly allocated to receive either task-oriented robot-assisted arm-hand training (experimental group) or task-oriented non-robotic arm-hand training (control group). For training, the T-TOAT (Technology-supported Task-Oriented Arm Training) method was applied. Training was provided during 8 weeks, 4 times/week, 2× 30 min/day.ResultsA significant improvement after training on the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) was demonstrated in the experimental group (p = 0.008). Results were maintained until 6 months after cessation of the training. On the perceived performance measure (Motor Activity Log (MAL)), both, the experimental and control group improved significantly after training (control group p = 0.008; experimental group p = 0.013). The improvements on MAL in both groups were maintained until 6 months after cessation of the training. With regard to quality of life, only in the control group a significant improvement after training was found (EuroQol-5D p = 0.015, SF-36 physical p = 0.01). However, the improvement on SF-36 in the control group was not maintained (p = 0.012). No between-group differences could be demonstrated on any of the outcome measures.ConclusionArm hand performance improved in chronic stroke patients, after eight weeks of task oriented training. The use of a Haptic Master robot in support of task-oriented arm training did not show additional value over the video-instructed task-oriented exercises in highly functional stroke patients.Clinical trial registration informationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN82787126

Robot-assisted task-oriented upper extremity skill training in cervical spinal cord injury: a feasibility study

“…5 Regarding training physiology, a goal-dependent functional and specific skill training was offered with training loads exceeding the patient's metabolic capacity (overload principle 4 ). As to motor learning principles, 'over-learning strategies' (that is, continued practice after performance), 'exercise variability' to improve patient's motivation and conserve training effect and 'guidance and feedback' 5,9 (provided by the haptic robot device 8,11 ) were used. Patients were offered a task-oriented training, that is, a repetitive training of self-selected, real life activities, to also improve their motivation.…”

“…In clinical rehabilitation practice, however, it is well known that high levels of movement repetition and lack of training variation may lead to patients becoming bored, and thus may lead to decreased motivation to train and to lower levels of therapy adherence. To explore the possibilities for extending ToCUEST's training variation, which, in turn, might further improve patients' training motivation, 5,7 the use of training technology was considered, analogous to the work of Timmermans et al, 8,9 who developed and evaluated a technologyassisted task-oriented arm training approach (T-TOAT) for persons with stroke. The use of such a training approach to improve AHSP in persons with C-SCI has not yet been reported.…”

Outcome Measurement in Neurodegenerative Disease: Attributes, Applications & Interpretation

“…The instrument has been widely used to assess patients with neurodegenerative disease including PD [95][96][97][98], MS [99,100] and stroke [101,102]. It has been largely reported that data collected with the SF-36 questionnaire are of good quality, reliable and that scoring of the subscale scores is appropriate.…”

E2Rebot: A robotic platform for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with neuromotor disability

“…Several published studies [11][12][13][14] demonstrate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted therapy in patients with ABI. Almost every study shows that patients receiving assistive robotic training do not show better chances of improving their upper limb movement in most daily living activities.…”