2015
DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1063427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Systemic Therapy on Mental Health of Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Systemic therapy is a frequently used form of psychotherapy for the treatment of mental disorders in children and adolescents. The present study reports the results of the first meta-analysis on the effects of systemic treatment of mental disorders and behavior problems in children and adolescents. Based on systematic search in electronic databases (PsycINFO, Psyndex, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, CINAHL), k = 56 randomized, controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. We computed a random-effects meta-analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, although the majority of family therapy treatments are manualised, only some studies provide detailed descriptions of the intervention, such that it could be replicated in practice. Variation in length of family therapy treatments was noted throughout the literature and is an important observation given meta‐analysis of systemic interventions for child and youth mental health showed longer interventions produced larger effect sizes at follow‐up (Riedinger, Pinquart, & Teubert, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although the majority of family therapy treatments are manualised, only some studies provide detailed descriptions of the intervention, such that it could be replicated in practice. Variation in length of family therapy treatments was noted throughout the literature and is an important observation given meta‐analysis of systemic interventions for child and youth mental health showed longer interventions produced larger effect sizes at follow‐up (Riedinger, Pinquart, & Teubert, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence supporting the effectiveness (Chorpita et al, 2017;Weisz et al, 2012), sustainability (Weisz et al, 2018), and perceived value (Chorpita et al, 2015;Southam-Gerow et al, 2014) of core EBIs in routine practice continues to mount. Still, the potency of the FT approach in naturalistic form remains virtually untested (Riedinger et al, 2017). Is it reasonable to believe that non-manualized interventions governed by core FT elements are a viable alternative to manualized models for treating ABPs in usual care?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a handful of "brand name" family therapy models designed to treat adolescent behavior problems (ABPs), with three establishing themselves as efficacious for disruptive behavior, substance use, or both: functional family therapy (FFT), multidimensional family therapy (MDFT), and brief strategic family therapy (BSFT) (Hogue, Henderson, Becker, & Knight, 2018;McCart & Sheidow, 2016). Manualized family therapy models for ABPs have posted an exemplary record of success in comparison to individual and group treatments and, in meta-analyses, produced the largest effect sizes by a healthy margin (Baldwin et al, 2012;Riedinger, Pinquart, & Teubert, 2017;Tanner-Smith, Wilson, & Lipsey, 2013).…”
Section: Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This perspective shifts away from a linear consideration of family processes by recognizing the multiple recursive influences that shape family relationships and family functioning, perceiving it as an ongoing process throughout the life cycle [27]. Systemic family therapy has been shown to be an efficacious intervention for families and adolescents with a wide range of mental health problems, such as drug use [19,28,29,30,31,32]), eating disorders [29,30] and both internalizing and externalizing disorders [19,29,30,31,33,34,35,36]. Despite these advances, most of the literature has focused on either systemic family therapy as a whole, without taking into account the different approaches embedded within this framework, or on the effectiveness of more manualized approaches, such as multisystemic family therapy (e.g., [37]) or functional family therapy (e.g., [34,38]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%