1966
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1966.tb03220.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Sympathetic Vasoconstrictor Fibres, Noradrenaline and Vasopressin on the Intestinal Vascular Resistance during Constant Blood Flow or Blood Pressure

Abstract: The effects of stimulating vasoconstrictor fibres and infusing noradrenaline and vasopressin on intestinal vascular resistance were studied in cats, using either constant flow or constant pressure. The responses to stimulating constrictor fibres and to infusing noradrenaline were essentially the same whether pressure or blood flow was kept constant, and the earlier described autoregulatory escape was of about the same magnitude during both these conditions. The results further support the hypothesis that a red… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

1967
1967
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The gastro-intestinal circulation must play an important part in the vasoconstriction of the portal bed, since the splenic + pancreatic component of portal blood flow is probably smaller in the rabbit than the value of 15 % observed in the dog (Sapirstein, 1958). The present findings in unanaesthetized rabbits are at variance with the inability to sustain vasoconstriction in the isolated intestinal circulation of anaesthetized animals during direct and reflex sympathetic nerve stimulation ('autoregulatory escape' phenomenon-Folkow, Lewis, Lundgren, Mellander & Wallentin, 1964;Cobbold, Folkow, Lundgren & Wallentin, 1964;Dresel & Wallentin, 1966;Wallentin, 1966). It seems likely that a more reactive vasculature rather than species differences accounts for the difference in response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…The gastro-intestinal circulation must play an important part in the vasoconstriction of the portal bed, since the splenic + pancreatic component of portal blood flow is probably smaller in the rabbit than the value of 15 % observed in the dog (Sapirstein, 1958). The present findings in unanaesthetized rabbits are at variance with the inability to sustain vasoconstriction in the isolated intestinal circulation of anaesthetized animals during direct and reflex sympathetic nerve stimulation ('autoregulatory escape' phenomenon-Folkow, Lewis, Lundgren, Mellander & Wallentin, 1964;Cobbold, Folkow, Lundgren & Wallentin, 1964;Dresel & Wallentin, 1966;Wallentin, 1966). It seems likely that a more reactive vasculature rather than species differences accounts for the difference in response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…In both organs, escape occurs during constant flow perfusion and the initiating factor cannot be the decrease in total arterial flow (Dresel & Wallentin, 1966;Greenway et al 1967). However, as Dresel & Wallentin pointed out, these experiments did not exclude the possibility that a local accumulation of metabolites or the opening of shunt vessels results in a redistribution of the flow through certain areas of the organs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, the escape from vasoconstrictor fibre influence might also be ascribed to an autoregulatory phenomenon, perhaps on a myogenic or a. metabolic basis. The experiments in which polythene long-circuits were used confirm that such long-circuits introdiuce an unknown factor which can reduce the vascular response to nerve stimulation by as much as 50 %r (Dresel & Wallentin, 1966) and the results obtained must be treated with caution. However, these experiments suggest that the hepatic artery resistance vessels exhibit escape from the effects of stimulation of the: hepatic nerves as readily during constant flow perfusion as during constant, pressure perfusion.…”
Section: Pressure-flow Curves For the Hepatic Arterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these experiments suggest that the hepatic artery resistance vessels exhibit escape from the effects of stimulation of the: hepatic nerves as readily during constant flow perfusion as during constant, pressure perfusion. This means that, as in the intestine (Dresel & Wallentin, 1966), neurogenic reduction of the total artery flow cannot be the initiating factor.…”
Section: Pressure-flow Curves For the Hepatic Arterymentioning
confidence: 99%