1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb02163.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sward surface height on the performance of continuously stocked spring‐calving beef cows and their calves

Abstract: The response of continuously stocked sptingcalving beef cows and calves to a range of sward surface heights was determined. Mean sward heights of 4-5, 60, 70, 9 1 and II 0 cm (treatments A to E respeclively) were maintained from mid-May to mid-August (Period I) and treatments C, D and E continued until the end of September (Period 2), during which time mean sward heights were 5-4, 7-8 and 92 cm respectively. Hereford x Friesian or White Shorthorn-X Galloway cows with their Charolais-cross calves were used, wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Average grass heights of 6.6 cm observed in the plots with nitrogen fertiliser were in line with the data by Wright and Whyte [57] and Hodgson [25]. Grass production, measured in small plots protected N between MN and HN.…”
Section: Vegetal Aspectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Average grass heights of 6.6 cm observed in the plots with nitrogen fertiliser were in line with the data by Wright and Whyte [57] and Hodgson [25]. Grass production, measured in small plots protected N between MN and HN.…”
Section: Vegetal Aspectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies performed on perennial ryegrass-white clover pastures have shown that cattle intake is significantly reduced under continuous grazing when the mean sward height decreases below 6.0 cm (Baker et al, 1981;Forbes and Hodgson, 1985) and the effect of sward height on suckler cow live weight changes has been clearly observed (Wright and Whyte, 1989;Osoro et al, 2000c). Therefore it is easy to interpret the live weight changes achieved by cows under different available sward heights in the improved area during the grazing season.…”
Section: Animal Performancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Likewise, goats are able to include high percentages of gorse in the diet (Clark et al, 1982;Radcliffe, 1986) with significantly higher intake than sheep (Howe et al, 1988). However, the ability of cattle to exhibit diet selection is much lower (Illius and Gordon, 1993) and they have been shown to eat grass components with a higher fiber content than sheep, such as stem-flowers, and require a higher sward height (Wright and Whyte, 1989) than sheep (Osoro et al, 2002). Dumont and Gordon (2003) indicate that sheep and cattle initially select swards that allow them to meet both diet quality and quantity requirements, before using behavioural adjustments such as increasing daily grazing time to maintain diet quality for as long as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1997;Milsom et al . 2000) and to measure aspects of herbivory, agriculture and grassland productivity (Wright & Whyte 1989;Maxwell et al . 1994;Carrère, Louault & Soussana 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%