2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sustained axial load and cooling phase on post-fire behaviour of concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the concrete cracking, the secant compressive stiffness of CFST columns also decreases with increasing compressive load. Huo et al [33] and Yang et al [34] defined the compressive stiffness (EA) as the secant stiffness corresponding to the column strength of 0.4N u . This definition is also adopted in this paper to derive EA from N …”
Section: Proposed Model For Compressive Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the concrete cracking, the secant compressive stiffness of CFST columns also decreases with increasing compressive load. Huo et al [33] and Yang et al [34] defined the compressive stiffness (EA) as the secant stiffness corresponding to the column strength of 0.4N u . This definition is also adopted in this paper to derive EA from N …”
Section: Proposed Model For Compressive Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the tests, the ambient temperature was heating and 60 minutes' heating, respectively. The specimens were heated in an unstressed condition, which is considered to be more conservative than under load, when assessing the residual strength of concrete after fire exposure [18][19][20][21][22][23]. The top and bottom end plates were fully protected with ceramic fibre blankets for all specimens, including the stub columns used for measuring temperatures.…”
Section: Test Setup and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimens were placed in the furnace in an unstressed condition, which is considered to be more conservative than under load in terms of evaluating the residual strength of concrete after fire [15][16][17][18]. The top and bottom ends of the specimens, including the stub columns for measuring temperatures, were fully protected with ceramic fibre blankets to prevent heat being transferred into the specimens through the end plates.…”
Section: Test Conditions and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%