2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surgically implanted tags and translocation on the movements of common bream Abramis brama (L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gardner et al (2015) reported that while translocated common bream (Abramis brama) exhibited higher linear range sizes than resident fish, total distance moved was not significantly different. Although we know of no other published studies on the fine-scale movements of translocated freshwater fish, there are similarities to our findings among studies on broadscale movement of fish after translocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Gardner et al (2015) reported that while translocated common bream (Abramis brama) exhibited higher linear range sizes than resident fish, total distance moved was not significantly different. Although we know of no other published studies on the fine-scale movements of translocated freshwater fish, there are similarities to our findings among studies on broadscale movement of fish after translocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…By contrast, De Leeuw and Winter () found that most rheophilic cyprinids in the Meuse River, Belgium, (mean annual flow = 230 m 3 /s; including barbel and chub) moved over rather short longitudinal distances (<10 km) during the year using the fixed station NEDAP telemetry and De Vocht and Baras (), using classic manual mobile radio‐telemetry, found HR from 1.05 to 27.3 km in the Meuse (in between dams; hydropeaking flows; n = 14 individuals; 40‐km reach; 5–17 months of tracking). These examples illustrate that the limit of movement for HR of cyprinids often corresponded to the maximum length of the river stretch (Woolnough, Downing & Newton, ), which may reflect space‐use strategies constrained by habitat fragmentation (Gardner, Deeming & Eady, ; Gardner, Deeming, Wellby et al., ‐bream; Geeraerts et al., ‐roach). The HR for barbel and chub recorded here ranged from 150 m to 35 km (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some fish tagged for a previous study, in (Capra et al, 2017; barbel, n = 3; catfish, n = 5), with a potentially still active tag in 2010, were tracked as well as the newly tagged fish in this study. The behaviour, in terms of distances travelled and linear range of newly tagged fish and previously tagged fish, was deemed comparable (Gardner, Deeming, Wellby et al, 2015).…”
Section: Capture and Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attempts were made to minimize stress on individuals during tagging, including capturing fish by using a fish trap, minimizing the numbers of fish held in the fish trap, holding fish (before and after tagging) fully immersed in flowing river water, and limiting handling time (Thorstad et al 2013). While the effects of handling, clove oil anesthetization (Javahery et al 2012), and intracoelomic surgical implantation of tags (Cooke et al 2011) on fish movement and behavior are not fully understood, they are believed to be minimal and temporally limited (1-5 d; Cooke et al 2011;Gardner et al 2015). Furthermore, any potential effects from tagging on our comparisons should be minimal because all tagged fish where handled similarly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%