Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain

Suliman, Abdulhaq; Swift, Edward J.; Perdigão, Jorge

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8

Cited by 99 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It was found that etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid and silanizing bonded to resin composite achieved shear bond strength as high as 19.72± 7.73 MPa. Even sandblasting in combination with silanizing (16.20±3.01 MPa) did not reach bond strengths as high as using hydrofluoric acid etching with silanization [41]. Another in vitro study reported that silanization together with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid etching on the surface of feldspar-based ceramic bonded to composite improved bond strength dramatically (46.9±6.6 MPa) but was not statistically significant compared to silanization only (38.7±8.1 MPa) [42].…”

Section: Bond Strengths With Etching and Silanization Treatments Withmentioning

confidence: 95%

Insights on Ceramics as Dental Materials. Part II: Chemical Surface Treatments

Matinlinna

2011

Silicon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of surface treatment (conditioning) methods on dental ceramics is to improve the retention and bonding between the enamel or the dentin and ceramic veneer, with the help of resin composite luting cements. These types of surface treatments include chemically altering the surface of ceramics with some specific acidic etchants followed by applying a silane coupling agent (silane). The silane currently used in dentistry is 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane, a hybrid organic-inorganic trialkoxy ester monomer, which is diluted in an acidified water-ethanol solvent system. Such silane primers are said to be pre-hydrolyzed. Some oxide ceramics with high crystalline content, such as alumina and zirconia, cannot be easily etched with acid etchants. They should be silica-coated and silanized prior to bonding. A silane coupling agent should be applied after silica-coating to the ceramic surface to achieve chemical bonding and the optimal durable bond strength.

show abstract

Section: Bond Strengths With Etching and Silanization Treatments Withmentioning

confidence: 95%

Insights on Ceramics as Dental Materials. Part II: Chemical Surface Treatments

Matinlinna

2011

Silicon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Notwithstanding the spectrum of different causative factors, adhesion of composite resin to porcelain has been identified as one technique to repair fractured porcelain veneers 5,6) . To improve the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain, porcelain surface treatments such as diamond roughening, air-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide, and etching with acids have been investigated under in vitro conditions [7][8][9] . Recently, silane coupling agents were also introduced to enhance the bond strength of composite resins to silica-based ceramics 10,11) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Carbon dioxide laser application enhances the effect of silane primer on the shear bond strength between porcelain and composite resin

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Dentre os métodos capazes de produzir alterações superfi ciais na cerâmica, a literatura relata a utilização de asperização com pontas diamantadas (LACY et al, 1988;SULIMAN et al, 1993;EIKENBERG;SHURTLEFF, 1996;COCHRAN et al, 1998;KUMBULOGLU et al, 2003), jateamento com óxido de alumínio (BERTOLOTTI et al, 1989;WOLF et al, 1992;BERKSUN;SAGLAM, 1994;CHUNG;HWANG, 1997;ROBBINS, 1997), aplicação de agentes condicionadores, como o fl úor fosfato acidulado e o ácido fl uorídrico (SENDA et al, 1989;WOLF et al, 1993;TYLKA;STEWART, 1994;HOLLWEG, 1997; DELLA BONA; VAN NOORT, 1998, KUKIATTRAKOON;THAMMASITBOON, 2007). A literatura também relata a utilização de métodos tais como jateamento com partículas de óxido de alumínio-Al 2 O 3 (SHAHVERDI et al, 1998;WOLF et al, 1992;KIM et al, 2005;YESIL et al, 2007), asperização com pontas diamantadas (Kupiec et al, 1996), aplicação de silano (AGRA et al, 1993, DELLA BONA;NORTHEAST, 1994) e deposição de uma camada de sílica (SiOx) (OZCAN et al, 2006) sobre a cerâmica fraturada.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Efeito De Diferentes Tratamentos Superficiais Na Resistencia De Uniao De Reparo De Porcelana Com Resina Composta

Almilhatti¹,

Neppelenbroek²,

Moura³

et al. 2008

Publ. Biologicas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMOEste estudo avaliou o efeito de diferentes tratamentos superfi ciais na resistência de união ao cisalhamento de uma cerâmica feldspática (Noritake EX-3), reparada com uma resina composta (Z-100). Quarenta corpos-de-prova da porcelana foram incluídos em resina acrílica, polidos (# 320, # 600) e divididos em 4 grupos (n=10) de acordo com os tratamentos superfi ciais: G1) sem tratamento (controle); G2) condicionamento com ácido fl uorídrico a 10% por 60s; G3) asperização com ponta diamantada; G4) jateamento com Al2O3 (50μm). Após o tratamento, o silano (RelyX ceramic primer) e o adesivo (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose) foram aplicados nas superfícies da porcelana antes da união a 2 mm de resina composta. Após 24 h de armazenamento em água destilada a 37ºC e 24h de termociclagem (1.000 ciclos, 4ºC/60ºC, 15 s cada), os corpos-de-prova foram submetidos ao teste de cisalhamento em máquina de ensaios universal, com velocidade de 0,5 mm/min. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância e ao teste de Tukey (α=0,05). Os tratamentos superfi ciais (G2=25,00±2,99 MPa; G3=22,48±4,54 MPa; G4=24,18±5,03 MPa) demonstraram signifi cativamente (P<0,05) maiores valores de resistência de união quando comparados ao controle (G1=11,57±2,06 MPa), mas não apresentaram diferenças signifi cativas (P>0,05) entre si. A microscopia óptica revelou aproximadamente 80% de falhas adesivas para o grupo controle e 65% de falhas coesivas da porcelana para os grupos submetidos aos tratamentos superfi ciais. Foi possível concluir que os tratamentos superfi ciais avaliados melhoraram signifi cativamente a resistência entre a cerâmica Noritake e a resina Z-100.

show abstract

Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain

Cited by 99 publications

References 11 publications

Insights on Ceramics as Dental Materials. Part II: Chemical Surface Treatments

Insights on Ceramics as Dental Materials. Part II: Chemical Surface Treatments

Carbon dioxide laser application enhances the effect of silane primer on the shear bond strength between porcelain and composite resin

Efeito De Diferentes Tratamentos Superficiais Na Resistencia De Uniao De Reparo De Porcelana Com Resina Composta

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About