2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface roughness and texture on the bacterial adhesion on the bearing surface of bio-ceramic joint implants: An in vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface of the biomedical device is primarily inspected via surface roughness, which can prevent bacterial adhesion and favor the attachment of bone inducing cells 38 . The surface roughness of ~1.5 μm can stimulate osteoblast cells 38,39 . Figure 5 represents the mean roughness of PEEK/BG coatings and multi‐structured coatings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface of the biomedical device is primarily inspected via surface roughness, which can prevent bacterial adhesion and favor the attachment of bone inducing cells 38 . The surface roughness of ~1.5 μm can stimulate osteoblast cells 38,39 . Figure 5 represents the mean roughness of PEEK/BG coatings and multi‐structured coatings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exceptions are studies that have taken inspiration from nature to produce biomimetic surfaces that reasonably mimic the surface characteristics of such natural systems [ 6 10 ]. This has been achieved by incorporating beneficial topological characteristics of biological systems such as surface roughness and wettability encompassing dispersive interactions and transient hydrogen bonding between such surfaces/entities and the microorganism to thwart its adhesion [ 16 18 ]. Importantly, all such strategies have been mainly driven by the sole desire to prevent adhesion of viruses and bacteria in the first place.…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the surface roughness reduces from the sub-micron scale to the nano-scale level, two phenomena occur -the surface state gradually changes from hydrophobic to hydrophilic and becomes increasingly unfavorable for the adhesion of most bacteria. Second, the anchoring points for bacterial adhesion gradually decrease, weakening the bacterial-surface bonding strength [77,78]. At the same time, the nanometric roughness ensures integrin activation leading to higher osteoblast attachment [79].…”
Section: Dimensional Analysis Of Ch/hamentioning
confidence: 99%