2006
DOI: 10.2472/jsms.55.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Surface Roughness and Residual Stress on Fatigue Strength of Shot Blasted Ductile Cast Irons with Casting Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plastic deformation magnification of C6F45-1 is superior to that of C4F45-1. This result illustrates the effect of work hardening occurring in the shot brass and the uneven state of the surface to the wall thickness [6].…”
Section: Compression Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The plastic deformation magnification of C6F45-1 is superior to that of C4F45-1. This result illustrates the effect of work hardening occurring in the shot brass and the uneven state of the surface to the wall thickness [6].…”
Section: Compression Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It seems that the predicted fatigue limits are overestimated for specimens with/without shot blasting, which mirrors the unknown relation to the stress ratio and the local stress concentration induced by the presence of a hole. For the former relation, a correction by adding the stress ratio was considered by Yamabe et al [11]. For the latter relation, the stress concentration factor (K to ) is herein defined as the ratio of the maximum tensile stress (σ 1,max ) at the edge of the open hole to the stress that is located far from the hole (σ 0 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For common finishes of the machined parts studied herein, the factor a and exponent b can be given as 4.51 MPa and −0.265, respectively. Moreover, it is worthy of note that the effect of shot blasting has been taken into account in Equation (9) from the aspect of the improvement of the resultant hardness, which was deemed a primary parameter of the fatigue strength by Gerin et al [11]. The increase of compressive residual stress, on the other hand, is not considered for the sake of simplicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) to (7). The living probability F Sk =1-F fk is based on the obtained accumulated failure probability F fk .…”
Section: Stress σmentioning
confidence: 99%