2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface-active agents on bubble growth and detachment from submerged orifice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correspondingly, the volumetric gas flow rate into the bubble q (the blue line) stays flat at first, remains smaller than q 0 , and then increases rapidly. These changing trends are consistent with the characteristics of bubble nucleation and expansion processes shown in the literature, ,, demonstrating that in the SVMG, nucleation and expansion still exist in the beginning period of bubble formation (nucleation stage: q ≤ q 0, C does not move; expansion stage: q > q 0 , C hardly moves or fluctuates slightly at C y 0 ). However, Figure (a) also shows that the detachment stage does not occur after the expansion stage 0.48 ≤ t / T d < 0.53; conversely, the bubble experiences a second nucleation stage (0.53 ≤ t / T d < 0.96) and then expands until it departs from the orifice (0.96 ≤ t / T d < 1), in which the dimensionless volume nearly remains constant for a long time and then increases rapidly for a short time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Correspondingly, the volumetric gas flow rate into the bubble q (the blue line) stays flat at first, remains smaller than q 0 , and then increases rapidly. These changing trends are consistent with the characteristics of bubble nucleation and expansion processes shown in the literature, ,, demonstrating that in the SVMG, nucleation and expansion still exist in the beginning period of bubble formation (nucleation stage: q ≤ q 0, C does not move; expansion stage: q > q 0 , C hardly moves or fluctuates slightly at C y 0 ). However, Figure (a) also shows that the detachment stage does not occur after the expansion stage 0.48 ≤ t / T d < 0.53; conversely, the bubble experiences a second nucleation stage (0.53 ≤ t / T d < 0.96) and then expands until it departs from the orifice (0.96 ≤ t / T d < 1), in which the dimensionless volume nearly remains constant for a long time and then increases rapidly for a short time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The reaction can only proceed after the energy reaches the activation energy; similarly, the bubble can only expand after the pressure difference Δ P breaks the barrier, and in the expansion stage and detachment stage, the pressure difference Δ P keeps dropping. Eventually, the buoyancy force dominates over the surface tension and other inhibitory forces in the detachment stage . This type of detachment stage characterized by buoyancy-induced bubble floating and departing presents concentrated detachment locations, as shown in Figure (c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While this value is added as a parameter here, in practice bubble diameter can often be controlled by the addition of surfactants or nano-structuring the electrode surface. 29,[54][55][56][57] In addition, the contact angle at the electrode surface, which is often controlled by the modification of electrocatalyst layer, has also been shown to influence the resulting bubble diameter. 40,[58][59][60][61] These approaches would therefore also positively contribute to the mass-transport of dissolved ions and the resultant concentration overpotential.…”
Section: Influence Of Operational Parameters To the Bubble-induced Convection And The Resultant Concentration Overpotentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%