2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of support and promoter on Ru catalyst activity in microwave-assisted ammonia synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 This group has developed a Ru catalyst that has been enhanced by support- and promoter-effects. 23 Particularly, Cs was incorporated as a promoter for its electron-donating ability, 31 and microkinetic modelling found that Cs was the optimal promoter in maximally reducing the free energy of N 2 cleavage (the rate-limiting step of the reaction). 20 CeO 2 was used as a support material for its reversible Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ transformation and its abundance of oxygen vacancies, both of which enhance Ru surface electron density and promote conversion to NH 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 This group has developed a Ru catalyst that has been enhanced by support- and promoter-effects. 23 Particularly, Cs was incorporated as a promoter for its electron-donating ability, 31 and microkinetic modelling found that Cs was the optimal promoter in maximally reducing the free energy of N 2 cleavage (the rate-limiting step of the reaction). 20 CeO 2 was used as a support material for its reversible Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ transformation and its abundance of oxygen vacancies, both of which enhance Ru surface electron density and promote conversion to NH 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 A composition of 2 wt% Cs and 4 wt% Ru supported on CeO 2 experimentally exhibits optimal activity in a microwave field, and full characterization of this catalyst composition has been reported in previous work by this group. 23 This CsRu2–4%/CeO 2 catalyst will be the catalyst used for the entirety of this paper. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging of this catalyst (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, the existing catalysts can be heated using microwave irradiation. In the case of ruthenium-based catalysts, some production rates were reported to be from several hundred (400 °C, ambient pressure) to 4200 μmol g –1 h –1 at best (320 °C, 0.65 MPa), , while, in the case of plasma-catalytic ammonia synthesis using Ni on SiO 2 , synthesis rates as high as 6600 μmol g –1 h –1 (155 °C, ambient pressure) at best were reported; however, low-temperature plasma-mediated synthesis is still an emerging technology with inferior results, on average. Its main advantage remains the possibility of lower operating temperatures …”
Section: Comparison Of Methods For Ammonia Synthesis and Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40][41][42][43][44] In addition to this, CeO 2 has a very well-known ability to store oxygen [45] and reduce coke formation by altering the structural and electronic properties of catalysts. [41][42]46] The carbonaceous species that are deposited on the catalyst surface react with the surface oxygen from cerium oxide, and the gaseous oxidants in the reaction system then reoxidize it. In addition to this, CeO 2 as a support takes part during the catalysis in the oxidation reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CeO 2 possesses many properties including high thermal stability, good redox behavior and high coke‐resisting abilities [40–44] . In addition to this, CeO 2 has a very well‐known ability to store oxygen [45] and reduce coke formation by altering the structural and electronic properties of catalysts [41–42,46] . The carbonaceous species that are deposited on the catalyst surface react with the surface oxygen from cerium oxide, and the gaseous oxidants in the reaction system then reoxidize it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%