2004
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73340-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Supplemental Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Culture on Rumen Development, Growth Characteristics, and Blood Parameters in Neonatal Dairy Calves

Abstract: Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture was added to a texturized calf starter at 0 (control), 1, or 2% of dry matter to determine effects on intake, growth, blood parameters, and rumen development. Seventy-five Holstein calves (38 male; 37 female) were started on the experiment at 2 +/- 1 d of age and were studied for 42 d. Starter intake was measured, and fecal scoring was conducted daily. Growth and blood parameter measurements were recorded at weekly intervals. A subset of 6 male calves (2 per treatment) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
156
5
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
30
156
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also in agreement with previous research on the impacts of feeds supplemented with active yeast cultures, as they also did not alter the growth and performance of cattle fed both corn silage and pasture-based diets (Cabrera et al, 2000;Lesmeister et al, 2004;Mir & Mir, 1994). The lack of statistically significant changes to the ADG of WB fed cattle suggests that the WB does not hold the potential to alter animal performance, or that the contents of micronutrients contained within WB, such as condensed tannins, alcohol, were at insufficient concentration to statistically impact animal performance.…”
Section: Growth and Performance Of Angus-hereford Cross Cattlesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results are also in agreement with previous research on the impacts of feeds supplemented with active yeast cultures, as they also did not alter the growth and performance of cattle fed both corn silage and pasture-based diets (Cabrera et al, 2000;Lesmeister et al, 2004;Mir & Mir, 1994). The lack of statistically significant changes to the ADG of WB fed cattle suggests that the WB does not hold the potential to alter animal performance, or that the contents of micronutrients contained within WB, such as condensed tannins, alcohol, were at insufficient concentration to statistically impact animal performance.…”
Section: Growth and Performance Of Angus-hereford Cross Cattlesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Previous studies have explained the beneficial effects of yeast products as due to yeast cell components and fermented products such as organic acids, vitamins and nucleotides. However, inconsistent results due to the level and the source of the yeast culture product also have been reported (Williams et al, 1991;Lesmeister et al, 2004). In this study, inclusion of hydrolyzed yeast at 0.2% in calf starter did not have any influence on the growth performance of calves.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Therefore, the administration of an effective dietary immune enhancer or stress reducer may be beneficial for early development of the immune system, strengthening of immune competence and prevention of immune attenuation caused by various stressors of neonatal calves. Although the efficacy of administration of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on growth performance and production traits has been studied for mature ruminants (Seymour et al, 1995;Kumar et al, 1997;Lesmeister et al, 2004;Daniele et al, 2009), studies a Both authors equally contributed as the first author of this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesmeister et al (2004) also reported similar findings in calves. Increased growth in calves receiving probiotics may be the result of additional energy and nutrients available for skeletal deposition due to the observed increase in dry matter intake for probiotic supplemented group (Van Soest, 1994).…”
Section: Journal Of Animal Health and Productionsupporting
confidence: 74%