2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of subtle change in side chains on the photovoltaic performance of small molecular donors for solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This affected its optical properties, and the PCE of the BDT (T) (6.5%) and BDT (S) (4.7%) was significantly higher than that of the BDT (F) (3.0%). Intemann [81] et al used selenophene to replace thiophene in the core, and then copolymerized with 4,7-dibromo-5,6difluoro- [1][2][3] benzothiadiazole to obtain a new polymer, PIDSe-DFBT. Compared with the original PIDT-DFBT (1.88 eV), the optical gap of PIDSe-DFBT (1.80 eV) was smaller.…”
Section: Polymer Donor With Selenophene As Side Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This affected its optical properties, and the PCE of the BDT (T) (6.5%) and BDT (S) (4.7%) was significantly higher than that of the BDT (F) (3.0%). Intemann [81] et al used selenophene to replace thiophene in the core, and then copolymerized with 4,7-dibromo-5,6difluoro- [1][2][3] benzothiadiazole to obtain a new polymer, PIDSe-DFBT. Compared with the original PIDT-DFBT (1.88 eV), the optical gap of PIDSe-DFBT (1.80 eV) was smaller.…”
Section: Polymer Donor With Selenophene As Side Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar cells have always been a research hotspot, but also a technical problem, which also makes them the focus of attention all over the world. Since American scientists Kearns and Calvin first prepared organic photovoltaic devices with a metal/polymer/metal single-layer device structure in 1958 [2], the various properties of organic solar cells (OSCs) [3] have been greatly improved under the hard research of many scientists. Compared with the production of inorganic solar cells, OSCs have the advantages of a low production cost, light weight, strong design-ability of the organic molecular structure, and easy production processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic solar cells (OSCs) have attracted considerable attention because of their potential applications in portable electronics, integrated photovoltaic, and the Internet of things [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Over the past few years, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) values of OSCs rapidly increased because of the development of nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) [7][8][9][10][11] and new donor materials [12][13][14][15][16], which demonstrates the potential of OSCs in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic solar cells (OSCs), which could be fabricated via solution processing, hold promise as a low-cost and renewable thienyl groups in benzodithiophene (BDT) units could effectively decrease the energy levels and increase the crystallinity of PTB7-Th [44] and other BDT-containing polymers. [45][46][47][48][49] However, there are few studies on the photovoltaic performance of the blend of chlorinated PTB7-Th, named as PDX, and PDI-based NFAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be attributed to that the chlorine atoms decreased the electron‐donating ability of the BDT moiety. [ 48,59 ] The optical bandgap of the PDX polymer film calculated from the film absorption edge is 1.66 eV, which is a little larger than that of its nonchlorinate analogous, PTB7‐Th (1.62 eV). It's worthy to mention that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of PDX film is smaller than that of PTB7‐Th and the absorption edge of PDX:Ph(PDI) 3 blend film is steeper than that of PTB7‐Th‐based film as shown in Figure 1d, which implies a smaller Urbach energy, thus beneficial for smaller energy loss and better photovoltaic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%