2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin on biofilm formation and virulence factors of Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed variability in this phenotype across OM perturbants—EDTA, SPR741, and the genetic deletion of waaC reduced biofilm formation, while pentamidine and colistin increased biofilm formation. We reason that this increase may be attributed to the known ability for subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics to stimulate biofilm formation ( 44 , 45 ). That some OM perturbants impair biofilm formation is encouraging, particularly for guidelines that may be implemented to prioritize OM perturbants for further development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed variability in this phenotype across OM perturbants—EDTA, SPR741, and the genetic deletion of waaC reduced biofilm formation, while pentamidine and colistin increased biofilm formation. We reason that this increase may be attributed to the known ability for subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics to stimulate biofilm formation ( 44 , 45 ). That some OM perturbants impair biofilm formation is encouraging, particularly for guidelines that may be implemented to prioritize OM perturbants for further development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 96 microporous culture plates were studied, and the crystal violet staining method was used to quantitatively analyze the bacterial biofilm formation, similar to previous studies [21][22][23]. Moreover, scanning electron microscopy can be used to directly observe the formation of bacterial biofilm, as has previously been carried out for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli biofilm [24][25][26]. To investigate the relationship between culture conditions and biofilm formation ability, the temperature, pH, and culture medium were chosen as variables for experimental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Unlike these results, the CFX derivatives in our study showed no change of the MIC values until 8-passages in the same experimental conditions. The CFX resistance of S. aureus has genetically evolved via the acquisition of mutations in the gyrA or the norA gene following as; (i) accelerating the multidrug efflux pumps (MDEPs) such as norA, sepA, and medA, (ii) generating mutations at the quinolone resistancedetermining regions (QRDRs) to reduce the affinity of the CFX [34]. We concluded that the CFX-PPh3 derivatives have excellent antibacterial activity by inhibition of DNA gyrase and efflux pump ability.…”
Section: Gene Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%