2008
DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s3810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR

Abstract: Purpose:To investigate if study design factors such as randomization, multi-center versus single center evidence, institutional surgical volume, and patient selection affect the outcomes for endovascular repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR). Finally, we investigate trends over time in EVAR versus OSR outcomes.Methods:Search strategies for comparative studies were performed individually for: OVID’s MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HAPI, and Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) Reviews (including Cochrane DSR, ACP J… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tantly, with rapidly evolving technology such as endovascular surgery, outcomes may change over time, rendering results of some previous RCTs obsolete. 8 Well-designed retrospective cohort studies of open repair yield results that are both valid 9 and more broadly generalizable than the results of RCTs. The objective of this study was to compare overall and AAA-specific mortality, readmission, and reintervention after endovascular vs open repair of intact AAA in a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tantly, with rapidly evolving technology such as endovascular surgery, outcomes may change over time, rendering results of some previous RCTs obsolete. 8 Well-designed retrospective cohort studies of open repair yield results that are both valid 9 and more broadly generalizable than the results of RCTs. The objective of this study was to compare overall and AAA-specific mortality, readmission, and reintervention after endovascular vs open repair of intact AAA in a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the constant refinement of devices and technology, results from large trials often describe an obsolete device or outdated practice pattern and are thus difficult to compare to contemporary practice. 7 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Recent evidence has reported no significant difference in long-term mortality between OSR and EVAR. 36 Nevertheless, OSR has to remain a standard procedure, which needs to be mastered by every vascular surgeon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%