2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-019-01593-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of structural planes on rockburst position with respect to tunnel cross-sections: a case study involving a railway tunnel in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2016;Poeck 2016;Khademian 2019;He 2016;Manouchehriana 2018;Mitri 1999;Jiang 2010;Sharan 2007) in the rockburst prediction and its combination with other techniques is also a research topic that is investigated by many researchers, but it's main use focuses on the establishing of the burst prone areas and still there is not a universally accepted methodology of simulating accurately dynamic phenomena. Other research studies focus on the simulation of seismic waves generated from fault slips or from the failing rock and the associated damage that is caused in an underground excavation (Qinghua 2016;Banadaki 2012;Qiu 2019;Gao 2019;MJ Raffaldi 2017;Cho 2004;Hu 2019;He 2016). According to Kaiser (1996) numerical modeling for the rockburst prediction is based mostly on static approaches due to the complexity of the phenomenon and the difficulty to realistically simulate the dynamic procedures that are involved during a rockburst.…”
Section: Rockburst Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016;Poeck 2016;Khademian 2019;He 2016;Manouchehriana 2018;Mitri 1999;Jiang 2010;Sharan 2007) in the rockburst prediction and its combination with other techniques is also a research topic that is investigated by many researchers, but it's main use focuses on the establishing of the burst prone areas and still there is not a universally accepted methodology of simulating accurately dynamic phenomena. Other research studies focus on the simulation of seismic waves generated from fault slips or from the failing rock and the associated damage that is caused in an underground excavation (Qinghua 2016;Banadaki 2012;Qiu 2019;Gao 2019;MJ Raffaldi 2017;Cho 2004;Hu 2019;He 2016). According to Kaiser (1996) numerical modeling for the rockburst prediction is based mostly on static approaches due to the complexity of the phenomenon and the difficulty to realistically simulate the dynamic procedures that are involved during a rockburst.…”
Section: Rockburst Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 , 11 Additionally, it had also been found that the structural plane was fully related to the occurrence of rockburst at Jinping II Hydropower Station. 12 , 13 However, the fracture evolution pattern and the mechanical characteristics of fault-slip rockburst had not been clearly analyzed by the above-mentioned studies. 8 13 Therefore, we learn that the strength of geological structural plane will influence the safety of underground engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al [14] reported the occurrence of a rockburst, recording approximately 40 microtremors in two minutes, the distribution of which was consistent with the direction of the structural plane obtained by the on-the-spot investigation. In recent years, early warning methods based on microseismic monitoring have produced promising results and successful predictions, such as for the Access Tunnel of Shuangjiangkou Hydropower Station, Sichuan-Tibet Railway Tunnel, and Hanjiang-to-Weihe River Diversion Project [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%