1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(98)80480-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of stretch on the local structure of preely propagating premixed low-turbulent flames with various lewis numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
41
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capture of the flow field velocity ahead of the flame, and knowledge of the direction in which the flame front burns normal to its surface allows the calculation of the local tangential strain rate, Stt. Renou et al (1998) based on a where ut is the tangential velocity of the fresh mixture ahead of the flame, and s is the distance along the flame surface. Having calculated the tangential strain rate, Renou et al (1998) also proposed the calculation of the local flame stretch rate, K, such that…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capture of the flow field velocity ahead of the flame, and knowledge of the direction in which the flame front burns normal to its surface allows the calculation of the local tangential strain rate, Stt. Renou et al (1998) based on a where ut is the tangential velocity of the fresh mixture ahead of the flame, and s is the distance along the flame surface. Having calculated the tangential strain rate, Renou et al (1998) also proposed the calculation of the local flame stretch rate, K, such that…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 It is worth noting here that alternative methods of assigning a characteristic Lewis number have been proposed based on heat release measurements 30,31 and mole fractions of the mixture constituents. 32 In the past, the significant effects of characteristic Lewis number Le on various aspects of premixed combustion (e.g., thermo-diffusive instability of laminar flames, burning rate, scalar gradient statistics, and combustion modelling) have been addressed analytically, [33][34][35][36] experimentally, [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and numerically. 18,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Various concepts, which have been developed in order to explain such effects in turbulent flames, are reviewed elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the instantaneous flame stretch is both positive and negative as has been noted in many earlier studies (Rutland and Trouvé, 1993;Bray and Cant, 1991;Chen and Im, 1998;Nye et al, 1996;Renou et al, 1998;Kostiuk and Bray, 1993). However, these studies suggested that there is 50% or less probability for the flame stretch to be negative and this probability can be calculated by integrating the pdf shown in Fig. 14 from −∞ to 0.…”
Section: Flame Surface Density and Flame Stretchmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The instantaneous flame stretch can be positive or negative; a positive value implies that the flame surface area increases due to the combined effects of turbulence and flame propagation and negative stretch suggests that the flame surface is compressed resulting in the loss of flame area per unit volume. Earlier numerical (Rutland and Trouvé, 1993;Bray and Cant, 1991;Chen and Im, 1998), experimental (Nye et al, 1996;Renou et al, 1998) and modelling (Kostiuk and Bray, 1993) studies have demonstrated that there is 20-50% probability for the flame stretch to be negative. In the view of RANS methodology the average value of the flame stretch, Φ s , is expected to be predominantly positive and many modelling methods have been proposed in the past with this view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%