2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of strain rate on the cohesive properties and fracture process of a pressure sensitive adhesive

Abstract: Pressure sensitive adhesives provide beneficial properties for bi-material bonding and we here focus on influences of the loading rate. The cohesive law for a tape is measured using the J-integral method. In-situ studies of the fracture process are made. The fracture energy and cohesive law levels off below an engineering strain rate of about 2 s −1 . All the cohesive laws include two peak stresses, the first is associated with nucleation of cavities and occurs at a stress level comparable to the critical stre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different cohesion values for the shear and the T-peel tests were related to the direction of the adhesive matrix strain (note that shear and T-peel tests were performed at the same deformation rate). For the shear test, the strain direction was quasi-equatorial, while for the T-peel test the deformation occurred in the axial direction [ 56 ]. When the joints were subjected to shear, the movement occurred in a direction that did not allow the bubbles to grow, leading to a cohesive failure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The different cohesion values for the shear and the T-peel tests were related to the direction of the adhesive matrix strain (note that shear and T-peel tests were performed at the same deformation rate). For the shear test, the strain direction was quasi-equatorial, while for the T-peel test the deformation occurred in the axial direction [ 56 ]. When the joints were subjected to shear, the movement occurred in a direction that did not allow the bubbles to grow, leading to a cohesive failure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, cavity growth takes place as the joints are subjected to higher stress values, which provokes higher creep rates and shorter fracture times. This reduction in fracture time is due to a faster release of hydrostatic stress after the cavitation process [ 26 , 41 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]. Therefore, higher stress around the cavities promoted a reduction in the damping behaviour, increasing the cohesive fracture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transparent polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was used to manufacture the substrates used in the DCB specimens. This material presents a Young’s modulus of 3 GPa and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.35 [ 34 ]. The use of this material allowed for a better understanding of the fracture process of the PSA in the DCB tests, as it enabled the ability to visually observe the damage process throughout testing, considering its transparency properties.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the specimens were assembled with the acrylic PSA in a mould with 23 kPa applied to each joint and then resting for 72 h before being tested. Figure 2 represents the DCB specimens’ geometry, based on the work of Stigh and Biel [ 34 ], where is the thickness of the adhesive tape.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation