1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(97)00080-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of stocking density on the behaviour and growth of farmed red deer hinds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been reported with red deer hinds (Cervus elaphus) subjected to high stocking densities at pasture [8]. When the spatial constraint is severe, social tensions can be observed among fellow animals (increase of agonistic encounters, Fig.…”
Section: Behavioural Component Of the Adaptive Responsementioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This has been reported with red deer hinds (Cervus elaphus) subjected to high stocking densities at pasture [8]. When the spatial constraint is severe, social tensions can be observed among fellow animals (increase of agonistic encounters, Fig.…”
Section: Behavioural Component Of the Adaptive Responsementioning
confidence: 55%
“…duration, Fig. 1b) [8]. Such behavioural coping strategies limit social tensions, at the same time enabling subordinate hinds to keep a total grazing time similar to that of dominant individuals.…”
Section: Behavioural Component Of the Adaptive Responsementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Space allowance must also take into account the age, sex and weight of the animals (DEFRA, 2006). High densities may induce social stress and modification of grazing patterns, especially in subordinate individuals (Blanc and Thériez, 1998). Furthermore, high densities induce the animals to form larger groups (Putman, 1988) in which the nearest neighbour distance tends to decrease, thus producing an increase of aggressive interactions (Clutton-Brock et al, 1982).…”
Section: Accommodation and Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social groups impose constraints on subordinate individuals. In grazing red deer, for example, the subordinates do not have access to preferred patches [2] are less synchronised with the dominants [10] and have a lower biting rate when near the dominants [49]. Similar hierarchical social relationships may, for example, be expected to reduce the foraging efficiency of subordinate members of groups of domestic herbivores at the high stocking densities in each successive paddock in a rotational grazing system.…”
Section: Scaling Issues: Preferences May Change With Scale Due To Socmentioning
confidence: 99%