2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of stocking density on the growth performance, serum biochemistry, muscle composition and HSP70 gene expression of juvenile golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…teira at the lowest density treatment (317 fish/m 3 ) were significantly higher than those in the higher stocking densities (635–1,587 fish/m 3 ) (Table 1). These results were similar to Pacific red snapper Lutjanus peru (Castillo‐Vargasmachuca et al., 2012) and juvenile golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus (Yang et al., 2020), which all found hindered growth performance at higher stocking densities. It suggested that higher stocking density promotes intraspecific competition for food or living space, which has a negative effect on the growth performance of farmed fish (Baras & Jobling, 2002; Boujard, Labbé, & Aupérin, 2002; Diana, Yi, & Lin, 2004).…”
Section: Parameters Treatment a (317 Fish/m3) B (635 Fish/m3) C (952 supporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…teira at the lowest density treatment (317 fish/m 3 ) were significantly higher than those in the higher stocking densities (635–1,587 fish/m 3 ) (Table 1). These results were similar to Pacific red snapper Lutjanus peru (Castillo‐Vargasmachuca et al., 2012) and juvenile golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus (Yang et al., 2020), which all found hindered growth performance at higher stocking densities. It suggested that higher stocking density promotes intraspecific competition for food or living space, which has a negative effect on the growth performance of farmed fish (Baras & Jobling, 2002; Boujard, Labbé, & Aupérin, 2002; Diana, Yi, & Lin, 2004).…”
Section: Parameters Treatment a (317 Fish/m3) B (635 Fish/m3) C (952 supporting
confidence: 81%
“…In aquaculture, stocking density is an important issue that affects fish survival and growth (Chavez, Fang, & Carandang, 2011; Ebrahimi, Imanpoor, & Adlo, 2010). Previous studies have shown that higher densities can negatively affect the growth performance of some aquacultured species (Castillo‐Vargasmachuca et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2020). Conversely, high stocking densities may positively affect growth on other farm fishes (Pirozzi, Booth, & Pankhurst, 2009; Samad, Nan, & Lee, 2014).…”
Section: Parameters Treatment a (317 Fish/m3) B (635 Fish/m3) C (952 mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reduction of welfare conditions is reflected by the inhibition of the GH/IGF system [ 121 ], and by an enhanced catabolism of lipids and amino acids [ 117 ]. Stocking density can also modulate other cellular and immune responses [ 122 , 123 ]. Therefore, oxidative stress responses in plasma (i.e., CAT, SOD, GR, GST), and Hsp70 expression in brain, liver, and kidney can be used as biomarkers of long-term stress situations [ 122 ].…”
Section: Taxonomic Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stocking density can also modulate other cellular and immune responses [ 122 , 123 ]. Therefore, oxidative stress responses in plasma (i.e., CAT, SOD, GR, GST), and Hsp70 expression in brain, liver, and kidney can be used as biomarkers of long-term stress situations [ 122 ]. Alternatively, key components of the innate immune system (i.e., IL-1β, LZM, TNF, TLR-3, and MHC) determined in fish skin mucus also reflected the negative effects of long-term impaired welfare [ 123 ].…”
Section: Taxonomic Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%