2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00278-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of stimulus modality on the shuttle activity in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative is the deployment of devices (acoustic or optical) in which the task is to warn animals against approaching danger. For most mammal species, audible signals are of greater stimulatory significance than visual ones (e.g., Zieliń ski et al, 1991Zieliń ski et al, , 1995Werka et al, 2004). In turn, either animals fail to react to artificial emitted sounds, or the effectiveness of the latter appears to be short lived (Woronecki, 1988;Curtis et al, 1995;Putman, 1997;Belant et al, 1998;Ujvári et al, 2004;Edgar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is the deployment of devices (acoustic or optical) in which the task is to warn animals against approaching danger. For most mammal species, audible signals are of greater stimulatory significance than visual ones (e.g., Zieliń ski et al, 1991Zieliń ski et al, , 1995Werka et al, 2004). In turn, either animals fail to react to artificial emitted sounds, or the effectiveness of the latter appears to be short lived (Woronecki, 1988;Curtis et al, 1995;Putman, 1997;Belant et al, 1998;Ujvári et al, 2004;Edgar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%