1994
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90132-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of stimulation of the frontoparietal cortex and parafascicular nucleus on locomotion in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrical stimulation of structures including the habenula or habenulo-interpenduncular tract (fasciculus retroflexus) decreases respiratory amplitude and frequency in anesthetized cats (20), which suggests that cells surrounding (para) the fasciculus triggered the response because the fiber tract itself is an unlikely source. In conscious rats, electrical stimulation of the lateral parafascicular nucleus, which corresponds to the nucleus centrum medianum in primates, inhibits spontaneous and stimulation-induced movements without noticeably affecting respiration (32). The present observations of electrical stimulation of the thalamus in unanesthetized fetal sheep are unique in that breath period increased without changing amplitude when the stimulations involved areas within or adjacent to the Pf, ventral tegmental area, rostral central gray, and substantia nigra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Electrical stimulation of structures including the habenula or habenulo-interpenduncular tract (fasciculus retroflexus) decreases respiratory amplitude and frequency in anesthetized cats (20), which suggests that cells surrounding (para) the fasciculus triggered the response because the fiber tract itself is an unlikely source. In conscious rats, electrical stimulation of the lateral parafascicular nucleus, which corresponds to the nucleus centrum medianum in primates, inhibits spontaneous and stimulation-induced movements without noticeably affecting respiration (32). The present observations of electrical stimulation of the thalamus in unanesthetized fetal sheep are unique in that breath period increased without changing amplitude when the stimulations involved areas within or adjacent to the Pf, ventral tegmental area, rostral central gray, and substantia nigra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The lPF projects not only to motor‐related areas of cerebral cortex and striatum but also to the subthalamic nucleus (Berendse and Groenewegen, 1990, 1991; Mouroux and Feger, 1993). Because stimulation of the lPF inhibited movement in free‐roaming rats (Mileikovsky et al, 1994), we have previously suggested that this lPF→subthalamic circuit may be related to stopping ongoing behavior and allowing the initiation of new motor programs (Krout et al, 2001). In addition to these efferent projections, the lPF receives inputs from “motor related” brainstem sites, including the substantia nigra, nucleus Darkschewitsch, superior colliculus, cuneiform nucleus, vestibular nuclei, and dorsal column nuclei (see Table 1) (Krout and Loewy, 2000b; Lai et al, 2000; Krout et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function of the PF is unknown, but it may be involved with motor functions, antinociception, and limbic activity (Sakata et al, 1988; Mileikovsky et al, 1994; Butkevich and Kassil, 1999). The PF has been subdivided into medial and lateral components based on anatomical connections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%