2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of state ownership on companies’ capital structure and profitability: Estimation analysis before and after the Lehman shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the effect of state ownership on leverage is positive and statistically significant in high-income countries (Model 1), while in lower-middle-income countries its effect is negative and statistically significant (Model 3). These findings are also consistent with other studies (Dewenter & Malatesta, 2001;Firth, Lin, & Wong, 2008;Nhung & Okuda, 2015). In high-income countries, state-owned enterprises carry 6.40% more debt than nonstate-owned enterprises, while in lower-middle-income countries, state-owned enterprises carry 8.1% less debt than their counterpart.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results show that the effect of state ownership on leverage is positive and statistically significant in high-income countries (Model 1), while in lower-middle-income countries its effect is negative and statistically significant (Model 3). These findings are also consistent with other studies (Dewenter & Malatesta, 2001;Firth, Lin, & Wong, 2008;Nhung & Okuda, 2015). In high-income countries, state-owned enterprises carry 6.40% more debt than nonstate-owned enterprises, while in lower-middle-income countries, state-owned enterprises carry 8.1% less debt than their counterpart.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…He suggested that debt is less likely to be an effective governance tool to discipline the managers of government-controlled firms. Hardiyanto et al (2015) and Nhung and Okuda (2015) found a negative impact of government ownership on the firms' financial leverage. Hence it is hypothesized that:…”
Section: Government Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Primeiramente, a firma financia seus projetos com a utilização de recursos internos, através da retenção de lucros. Se os recursos não forem suficientes, a empresa optaria pelo financiamento externo, por meio da dívida, e, em último caso, emitiria ações, o que não é desejável pelos shareholders, pois essa emissão reflete o valor da ação da companhia (Alves et al, 2015;Florackis, Kanas, & Kostakis, 2015;Myers & Majluf, 1984;Nhung & Okuda, 2015).…”
Section: Correntes Teóricas Da Estrutura De Capitalunclassified
“…Diante do exposto, é possível dizer que esses resultados estão de acordo com o preconizado pela Teoria Peckin Order, pois se presume a existência de uma hierarquia no tocante às fontes de financiamento. Em primeiro lugar, por recursos internos (fluxo de caixa -EBITDA) e em seguida por recursos de terceiros (endividamento) (Alves et al, 2015;Florackis, Kanas, & Kostakis, 2015;Myers & Majluf, 1984;Nhung & Okuda, 2015). Também, pela Teoria da Agência, porque com o endividamento, além da possível redução dos custos de agência, diminui-se o fluxo de caixa livre, o que reduz os investimentos discricionários dos gestores (Frank & Goyal, 2003;Jensen & Meckling, 1976;Kayo & Fama, 2004;Medeiros & Daher, 2008).…”
Section: Ibepesunclassified