2014
DOI: 10.1111/jch.12374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Spironolactone on Dialysis Patients With Refractory Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Study

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of spironolactone on dialysis patients with refractory hypertension and possible adverse effects. This was a 12-week prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of 82 patients randomly assigned to 12-week treatment with 25 mg/d spironolactone or placebo as add-on therapy. Visits were scheduled at the start of treatment and after 12 weeks. Measurements of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and morning BP were performed. After 12 weeks, spirono… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from its hormonal function on renal handling of sodium, spironolactone as a pleiotropic hormone can activate mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) in nonepithelial tissues, therefore affecting a variety of tissues (eg, myocardium, endothelium, and vascular smooth muscles). Recently, spironolactone was satisfactorily used in patients with refractory hypertension and in dialysis patients with reduced CCV morbidity and mortality …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from its hormonal function on renal handling of sodium, spironolactone as a pleiotropic hormone can activate mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) in nonepithelial tissues, therefore affecting a variety of tissues (eg, myocardium, endothelium, and vascular smooth muscles). Recently, spironolactone was satisfactorily used in patients with refractory hypertension and in dialysis patients with reduced CCV morbidity and mortality …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, spironolactone was satisfactorily used in patients with refractory hypertension and in dialysis patients with reduced CCV morbidity and mortality. [5][6][7] Spironolactone is not widely studied in dialysis populations, however, because of potential side effects (hyperkalemia and nonphysiologic gynecomastia). To address this clinical concern, we conducted a prospective randomized trial to evaluate its long-term effects on survival rate, CCV protection, and various clinical parameters in dialysis patients with ESRD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a group of patients without dialysis Pisoni et al obtained therapeutic efficacy, but with the risk of generating hyperkalemia, and a fall in the GFR 18 . In patients undergoing dialysis therapy, Xiaoying Ni et al achieved a significant reduction in blood pressure, but 2 patients required the discontinuation of medication by the development of hyperkalemia 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of small pilot studies assessing surrogate cardiovascular risk factors, such as blood pressure, LV mass index (LVMI), LV ejection fraction, carotid intima‐media thickness, and vascular calcifications supported a beneficial cardioprotective effect of MRAs in dialysis patients . Two recent larger studies assessing “hard” cardiovascular endpoints provided stronger evidence in this issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 A number of small pilot studies assessing surrogate cardiovascular risk factors, such as blood pressure, LV mass index (LVMI), LV ejection fraction, carotid intima-media thickness, and vascular calcifications supported a beneficial cardioprotective effect of MRAs in dialysis patients. [17][18][19][20][21] Two recent larger studies assessing "hard" cardiovascular endpoints provided stronger evidence in this issue. The first was the Dialysis Outcomes Heart Failure Aldactone Study (DOHAS), 22 in which 309 oligoanuric hemodialysis patients were randomized to spironolactone (25 mg/d) or standard care for a mean follow-up period of 3 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%