2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of speed and accuracy strategy on choice step execution in response to the flanker interference task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar postural adjustment errors have been observed previously during forward stepping when subjects were unsure about which limb to step with during choice reaction time step tasks (Patla et al 1993; Jacobs and Horak 2007; Cohen et al 2011). The error rates for the Younger-SB1 and Older-SB1 groups are consistent with error rates produced in younger adults during performance of forward stepping, where the direction of forward step was cued by directional arrows embedded in congruous and incongruous flankers (Uemura et al 2013a; Uemura et al 2013b). Specifically, the error rate when incongruous flankers were displayed was approximately 30% greater than the error rate when congruous flankers were shown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar postural adjustment errors have been observed previously during forward stepping when subjects were unsure about which limb to step with during choice reaction time step tasks (Patla et al 1993; Jacobs and Horak 2007; Cohen et al 2011). The error rates for the Younger-SB1 and Older-SB1 groups are consistent with error rates produced in younger adults during performance of forward stepping, where the direction of forward step was cued by directional arrows embedded in congruous and incongruous flankers (Uemura et al 2013a; Uemura et al 2013b). Specifically, the error rate when incongruous flankers were displayed was approximately 30% greater than the error rate when congruous flankers were shown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…George et al 2007). In addition, several studies have detailed errors in the generation of initial postural responses when uncertainty about the appropriate postural response is created by presenting multiple stimulus-response options (Cohen et al 2011; Sparto et al 2013; Uemura et al 2013a; Uemura et al 2013b). However, the number of initial postural adjustment errors increase with age (Cohen et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a strategy can be imposed by giving specific instructions to the participants. In Uemura et al's (2013) study of the instructed prioritization of speed over accuracy in healthy young adults, the researchers observed a shorter RT, swing phase and total step execution time but a greater APA error rate under conflict resolution conditions, compared with the accuracy strategy [98]. However, the step error rate did not differ significantly as a function of the instructions.…”
Section: Gait Initiationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, in the particular case of a choice step execution task (i.e. a dual task involving gait initiation and a flanker interference task), the participants can choose to prioritize speed (motor task prioritization) or accuracy (cognitive task prioritization) or to aim at a speed-accuracy trade-off [98]. Such a strategy can be imposed by giving specific instructions to the participants.…”
Section: Gait Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following events were extracted from the vertical force data: (1) APA onset: the first time when the difference in vertical force under the 2 feet increased by 5% of the participant's body weight; (2) APA errors: trials in which participants executed an APA in the incorrect direction, corrected themselves, and stepped with the correct foot [15]; (3) foot off: the first moment when the vertical force under either foot decreased to zero, and (4) foot contact: the first moment when the vertical force under the swing leg increased >10 N. Step execution time was calculated as the time from the cue to foot contact. Individual step execution phases were calculated based on the following criteria: (1) reaction phase: the time from cue to APA onset; (2) APA phase: the time from APA onset to foot off, and (3) swing phase: the time from foot off to foot contact [27,28]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%