2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of spectral radius and settling time in the performance of echo state networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, the range of the spectral radius is set to [0.05; 0.9], in steps of 0.05. We can conclude that the system performed well at α = 0.8 and this value is also confirmed by [34].…”
Section: Spectral Radiussupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that, the range of the spectral radius is set to [0.05; 0.9], in steps of 0.05. We can conclude that the system performed well at α = 0.8 and this value is also confirmed by [34].…”
Section: Spectral Radiussupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Jaeger [31] identified some parameters to be appropriately selected for developing an effective ESN: reservoir size, spectral radius of reservoir weight matrix and the scaling of input. For more details Alexandre et al [32], Yuanbiao et al [33], Venayagamoorthy et al [34], Koryakin et al [35] and Rodan et al [36] have also developed some literatures towards the choice of ESN parameters.…”
Section: Echo State Performance and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reservoir has memory or is in the "echo state" (edge of chaos) [46]; however we find no indicative pattern ( Figure 10).…”
Section: Complexitycontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…For model selection, in the following experiments, we considered different hyper-parameterizations for reservoir (including the reservoir dimension, the scaling of the matrices collecting input-to-reservoir and internal recurrent reservoir connections weights) and for readout regularization, which have been shown to be relevant for the RC models performance (e.g. [57,13,58,59]).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Treeesnmentioning
confidence: 99%